How do you know about the X64 process? - General

Alexey Busygin 2015.02.04 08:14 #111

Mikalas:

The difference is a fairly high speed of execution of the order.

Orders are executed on the server side, not on the terminal side. Asynchrony can be understood as diversity, which, given the unit of time, can easily fit into an x86 architecture, but synchrony will not fit into an x86 process architecture, only x64.

Errors, bugs, questions Impulse OrderSendAsync() function

Mr. Trillioner 2015.02.04 08:21 #112

Alexey:
Orders are executed on the server side, not on the terminal side. Asynchrony can be understood as diversity, which, given the unit of time, can easily fit into an x86 architecture, but synchrony cannot fit into an x86 process architecture, only x64.

So if you're not looking at HTF you don't really need it. As for the architecture - again, if you don't operate with such huge amounts of data (over 4 Gb) x64 won't be of much use to you. Again, speed and lots of data don't fit together :)

FOREX - Trends, forecasts The NSP and the Interesting and Humour

Alexey Busygin 2015.02.04 08:24 #113

mmmoguschiy:
x64 is not multiprocessing. It is just a platform type. It only uses more than 4 gigabytes of memory. During synchronous execution after sending an order the program stops executing until it receives a response from the server whether the order has been executed or not. If the order is asynchronous, any other actions, including sending other orders, may be performed without waiting for an answer. It is used in HFT systems.

The kernel is responsible for many processors and not the memory. In the x64 architecture the kernel system is accounted for. In x86 there is no such accounting, synchronous processes allows you to work with multiple processes at once, for example you can run multiple EAs in one thermal domain while in x86 their work would be queued up and executed one by one separately.

Errors, bugs, questions A little surprised :) MT5 and speed in

Alexey Busygin 2015.02.04 08:37 #114

mmmoguschiy:
If you're not looking at HTF, you don't really need it. As for the architecture - again, if you don't operate with such huge amounts of data (more than 4 Gb) x64 will hardly be useful for you. Again, speed and large data volumes don't fit together :)

I don't operate, but computer doesn't recognize other architecture, only x64 with 2 cores. Same as, when Intel had 1 core engine, computer didn't recognize x64. Memory is mainly for remembering, but don't confuse it with hard disk, this memory is not for forgetting. :)

Alpha9 EA *** Released That's the style! :) what does 5 Activations

Mr. Trillioner 2015.02.04 08:39 #115

Alexey:
The kernel is responsible, not the memory, for many processors. The x64 architecture keeps track of the kernel system. In x86 there is no such accounting, synchronous processes allow you to work with several processes at the same time, for example, you can run several advisors in one thermal domain, and in x86 architecture their work would be lined up and executed one by one in heterogeneous

I'm not going to argue with you anymore. it makes no sense and is off the topic of this thread. read some thematic articles and get your head in order

Any rookie question, so Spammers, private message spam, Interesting and Humour

Alexey Busygin 2015.02.04 08:52 #116

mmmoguschiy:
I'm not going to argue with you anymore. It makes no sense and is out of the scope of this thread.

And you don't need to, memory is needed for a large number of dynamic variables, and kernels need these variables to be able to run in multiple threads, without waiting for a queue. Hence processor speed could be reduced, but with the increased capability, the need for kernel speed has increased again.

[ARCHIVE]Any rookie question, so My approach. The core Increase speed of Indicator

Ramiz Mavludov 2015.02.04 08:58 #117

Myth63:
No brokerage house has the money to move the price by 1 pip.

Are you sure? Look at the Alpari quotes and compare them with the robo, on EURUSD.

Alexey Busygin 2015.02.04 09:10 #118

Myth63:
ECN ok =) it's made to reduce the scalp level. you pay a commission instead of a wider spread. ECN is essentially guaranteed earnings for the broker...

In essence the commission is something like a swap free account, swap free. Then the question is, why reinvent the literacy?

Mr. Trillioner 2015.02.04 09:14 #119

Alexey:
Essentially the commission is something like a swap-free, swap-free account. Then the question is, why re-invent the literacy?

Once again you have your own view of the situation. Swap is swap and has nothing to do with commission.

The discussion of secrets of brokers turns into the discussion of ECN - it all comes down to this))

Any questions from newcomers Off-topic posts Quantum trading system

Alexey Busygin 2015.02.04 09:23 #120

mmmoguschiy:
and again you have your own view of the situation. Swap is swap and has nothing to do with commission.

We are turning from the secrets of brokers into the discussion of ECN - it all comes down to this)).

If you do not know what to do with swap, then you may be mistaken and we don't know what to do about it. And swap free, open, close, pay.

Secrets of your broker - page 12