My approach. The core is the engine. - page 109
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You don't change the trading platform when you lose.
You change the EA.
What if you don't have to change the EA? Just reconfigure it, put in a different strategy and that's it.
Well, it doesn't change anything. What difference does it make?
The question is, who may be interested in your library? I see only one option - a person who knows programming well enough, but prefers "manual" trading. At the same time having enough experience in trading to earn manually.
And you also add the condition "treat the expert as a toy". And if before this "clarification" there were simply very few people interested, with this "clarification" there will be none at all.
George, I've told you a hundred times: I don't have any library.
There is a plug-in engine that carries the user's GUI. In the future, the engine will have different functions.
It makes creating complex interactive robots MUCH EASIER.
It is a simple markup language. Write the GUI, plug in the engine, ALL.
This is your personal understanding of the nature of trading programmes. You are defending your belief in the market. It is supported by your personal experience and personal beliefs.
But look at me. I perceived things differently from the start. Everyone perceives things differently. You are trying to elevate your understanding to a RULE.
But, there are NO RULES of understanding.
Understanding can be manipulated. It is a flexible substance.
A poor person is clinging to a small deposit and trying to squeeze what he can out of the market. Everything is too serious for him. And a rich person is having as much fun as he or she can. For him, a trading robot is a toy.
And who is more right?
Both are right in their own way.
There was a gambler like that once before. Got caught up in the casino. Hanged himself. I wish I didn't know him. I don't respect people like that, spending all they can on their gambling addiction. And that good man was my first wife's second husband, and he blew the money my daughter owed me in alimony. Ugh. That's quite a niche you found yourself. And you're probably not averse to playing around...
... You probably don't mind playing yourself...
I have a different game. Banging my head against the concrete wall of misunderstanding on the forum. )) Also fun.
George, I've told you a hundred times: I don't have any library.
There is a plug-in engine that carries the user's GUI. In the future, the engine will have different functions.
It makes creating complex interactive robots MUCH EASIER.
It is a simple markup language. You write a GUI, plug in the engine, ALL of it.
So what is a plug-in engine? It's a "library".
And you don't see a contradiction in your words - you're talking about "complex interactive robots" - so one must be good at programming. So about "simplicity" - that's a bit too much.
I'm not arguing, the markup language is not simple. However, I already mentioned that it's very inconvenient to use - you have to look often at the description, it's easy to mix up the parameters, and it's even difficult to modify something. For those who know very little about programming, even such a simple markup language is a serious task. And mentioning of a "complex interactive" puts an end to the interest of those who are weak in programming. Those who know programming well and write experts to order - will not use alien libraries. Those who write for themselves are very unlikely to be inclined to trade "hands". And if you also take into account the "approach to the game" - I am pretty sure that such people simply do not exist.
Note that I don't say much about OOP. One thing I always emphasise is the target audience. With your latest additions, it's not just minuscule - it simply doesn't exist.
What is a "plug-in engine"? It is a "library".
An engine is NOT a library. IT IS NOT A LIBRARY.
It is a plug-in program. A module. A plug-in.
.EX4
It carries the GUI. Executes the mechanics of the controls.
Markup language is very simple. It is 100 times easier than MQL.
Who will not be able to create a robot, will be able to use a robot. ))
The engine, it is NOT a library. IT IS NOT A LIBRARY.
It is a pluggable programme. A module. A plug-in.
.EX4
It carries the GUI. Executes the mechanics of the controls.
Markup language is very simple. It is 100 times easier than MQL.
Who will not be able to create a robot, will be able to use a robot. ))
There is no need to shout so much.
The fact that you have a "plugin program" ex4 - it doesn't change anything, dll is also a "plugin program".
That "the markup language is very simple" - you're obviously exaggerating. It's not easy to understand for someone who knows very little about programming.
And about "who can't build it, can't use it" - I don't get it... Where does the robot come from? Is there even one anywhere?
That "the markup language is very simple" is clearly an exaggeration. It's not easy for someone with very little knowledge of programming to understand it.
This will help. Moreover, you can use templates. You may take a code of a group of items or a window and paste it completely somewhere else. You may change it a bit.
And there's always someone to help.
And anyway, you're blowing the whole thing out of proportion. A person can either order code or buy a ready-made robot.
And the engine does not require any study. Plug it in and it works.
I have a different game. Banging my head against the concrete wall of misunderstanding on the forum. )) Also fun.
No way! Everybody understood everything a long time ago and even tried to explain that you are stuck in a fantasy very far from reality. Well well three years, maybe it was interesting to create. But beyond that?
It's a fiasco, Marivanna, a fiasco. That begs the question, Peter, have you never had to lose? How long does it take for the moment of realisation to come?
Besides, in the tester, all those guys don't work.
No way! Everyone has long understood and even tried to explain that you are stuck in a fantasy very far from reality. All right, three years, maybe it was interesting to create. But beyond that?
It's a fiasco, Marivanna, a fiasco. That begs the question, Peter, have you never had to lose? How long does it take for the moment of realisation to come?
Besides, in the tester, all those guys don't work.
Have you ever considered the narrowness of your understanding of the world? People. That you see everything through a needle's ear? That you can't think big? That you're not old enough to do the big, serious things....
But trolling someone on a forum is your thing.)