ForumSections

Exploring the Graal. "The 'tester grail' only works on the tester. And how to make an online chart become like a tester chart. Or - page 17

New comment
The main thing is to be a seeker
Renat Akhtyamov:
can you explain the gapic on friday?

No. I don't need to know that, I just need to know how to

1. not to lose.

2. make money on it.

The rest is crap.

Maybe currency intervention. I don't give a shit.

Martin CHEguevara:

No. I don't need to know that, I just need to know how to

1. not to lose.

2. make money on it.

The rest is crap.

Maybe currency intervention. I don't give a shit.

I see...

but I'm wondering...
Renat Akhtyamov:

I see...

I was wondering...

If you read it, fine, if you don't read it, that's fine, but it's up to you.

Files:
ur05tjau_uwqbuzl.zip  358 kb
Martin CHEguevara:

If you read it, fine, if you don't read it, that's fine, but it's up to you.

I've got this one.

I take notes when I write thoughtfully.

But Friday's G.P.E. doesn't work in this picture.

but I figured it out,

you could have predicted it, you could have

Renat Akhtyamov:

I've got this already.

I take notes when I write thoughtfully.

but friday's gep doesn't seem to work in this picture.
Wow.)
As for the Grail, I wanted to ask you a question:
I found a system that always gives a profit, I didn't notice it... "I have a lot of profitable systems and when you do several of them every day it's hard to notice it...
That's how I got by ... I worked for half a year until I realized I was reinventing the wheel I invented earlierXD and I realized the importance of what I did a long time ago...

It's not how I pictured it...like I'm sitting here with a grail of light, a camera engine, a realisation of global popularity...no...that's not how it works in reality... To be honest, I wasn't even surprised and didn't even notice it at first ... when you realize that the result of your efforts can either be nothing or everything ... there's nothing to be surprised about ...


And you, how did this moment pass? You've been working for years and the system is ready, or did it last for a few months (which is more realistic) ?)
I remember you saying "four years!" :В
Martin CHEguevara:
Wow.)
About the Grail, by the way, I wanted to ask you:
How did I find a system that always puts me in the black, I just didn't notice it... ₽ I have a lot of profitable systems and when you do several of them every day, you just look at its reliability...
I had my miso for about half a year until I realised I was reinventing the wheelXD and then I realised the importance of what I had done before...

I had pictured it differently...like I'm sitting here like this - grail light camera motor, illumination, global popularity...no...that's not how it works in reality... To be honest, I wasn't even surprised and didn't even notice it at first... when you realize that the result of your efforts can either be nothing or everything... there's nothing to be surprised about...


And you, how did this moment pass? You've been working for years and the system is ready, or the "fuck" has lasted a few months (which probably corresponds to reality) ?

Honestly?

Yeah, like you wrote here.

It was ready a long time ago, I just wasn't paying attention.

i once flubbed on a forum about a cool idea

and then I was just, you know, fluffing it up.

And then on Friday, I thought I'd check it out.

What a predictable GEP that turned out to be.

We flew a little too much on all the pairs, but we came back.

I remember now, when I blabbed.

one man was only against the system.

and he just disappeared at that exact moment....

remembered

it wasPAKO

;)

Renat Akhtyamov:

it wasPAKO)

Who the hell is that?

Martin CHEguevara:
Who the hell is that?

anyway

yours works.

I've had only 1 input error in 3 months.

but only on one pair.

I spent the whole weekend with this system.

Checked the other pairs - not so good, about 70% correct inputs, the rest - bypassed

I didn't calculate the total, because I've seen better ones.

well, i'll just forget it

I had to go back to the formula.

I foolishly changed something in it and started building one system after another

turned out to be OK, about three...

I put everything back in Formula as it was

and...

liked the result

well, let's see

;)

Renat Akhtyamov:

anyway

yours works.

I've only had 1 input error in 3 months.

but only on one pair.

I spent all weekend successfully with this system.

Checked the other pairs - not so good, about 70% correct inputs, the rest - bypassed

I didn't calculate the total, because I've seen better.

well, i'll just forget it

I had to go back to the formula.

I foolishly changed something in it and started building one system after another

turned out to be OK, about three...

I put everything back in Formula as it was

and...

liked the result

well, let's see

;)

what was the tricky way to get the output to compare ?

1...101112131415161718192021
New comment