From theory to practice - page 596
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Last 24 hours, 12%.
I've even emailed you how to apply the current multi-page development.
against the wall peaxxxxx
...
Did you manage to make the MT5 on ticks after all?
Please enlighten me, if it is not difficult, if there is something I really do not know about the trend, its beginning, its visualization, continuation and completion, and, actually, about the reversal, its beginning, continuation and completion.
Add to this list such a notion as the width of the trend).
Add to this list a concept such as trend width).
Could you clarify what the "width" of a trend is and how it is defined? Usually a trend is associated with a line, which is known to have no width (or thickness)...
Could you clarify what is the "width" of a trend? Usually a trend is associated with a line, which is notoriously not wide (or thick)...
Can we clarify what is the "width" of a trend and how is it defined? Usually a trend is associated with a line, which is notoriously not wide (or thick)...
No, a trend line is not a trend. The trend is a channel and the slope of the channel is the direction of the trend. A break in the channel may be considered a change in the trend. The channel width=the width of the trend. This interpretation is based on the fact that the price is sort of blurred and goes back and forth during the motion. If we can see some areas of the rectilinear movement, they are either price leaps or the noise is removed by filters of brokerage companies.
Probably the width of a trend channel
A channel is a channel and a trend is a trend. Both concepts are different and are not defined in the same way.
No, a trend line is not a trend. The trend is a channel and the slope of the channel is the direction of the trend. A break in the channel can be considered a trend change. The width of the channel = the width of the trend.
Thus, we are adding probability and yield issues to it. Is it really necessary?
Another interesting series of sums of increments, please make a histogram (as Alexander did).
So we are also bringing in issues of probability and profitability. Do we have to?
Everyone acts according to his own understanding).
Everyone acts according to the extent of their understanding).
And both are solved differently, and the end result is slightly different.