From theory to practice - page 550

[Yuriy Asaulenko]

Alexander_K:

This demolition as a measure of central tendency is the crux of the matter.

I'm sick of your demolition. There is no demolition. There is a heterogeneous environment.

[khorosh]

Yuriy Asaulenko:
Fuck off with your demolition. There is no demolition. There is a heterogeneous environment.

What do you mean, no roof?))

[Alexander_K]

In my opinion, the non-lagging thing to build a channel around is the midpoint of the spread: (High+Low)/2

[Alexander_K]

Yuriy Asaulenko:
Fuck off with your demolition. There is no demolition. There's a heterogeneous environment.

Go sleep it off, pops.

[Evgeniy Chumakov]

Alexander_K:

In my opinion, the non-lagging thing to build a channel around is the midpoint of the spread: (High+Low)/2

I suspect there is no no lag.

[Yuriy Asaulenko]

Alexander_K:

Go sleep it off, pops.

Advice after a year of pointless and relentless work.))

I'll be sober in the morning and you'll stay sober. (с) )))

[Alexander_K]

By the way, I'm telling you again - I've stopped the crazy grail chase and don't give me any of that heterogeneous environment crap.

Write for people - simple, clear and ingenious.

And maybe in a month or two I'll write something for my soul, quietly.

[Violetta Novak]

Evgeniy Chumakov:

I suspect there is no lag.

High i Low, although formed non-linear in time, have the same distribution as Close, and we will only know by the close of the candle, so there is a lag.

[Alexander_K]

Novaja:
Although High i Low are formed non-linearly in time, they have the same distribution as Close, and we know it only at closing of a candle, so we have a time lag.

Hmmm... What if we take the current Min/Max of a ticking moving array?

[Yuriy Asaulenko]

Alexander_K:

And maybe in a month or two I'll make something for my soul, quietly.

It's not a new song, either.)