You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I wish I had something to think about)))
K2 wrote about this somewhere in the middle of the thread.
Well yes, for example 99% of my code is technical risk handling. But we are talking about strategy here.
I wish I had something to think about)))
If only there was something to think about
I wish I had something to think about...))
Welcome back, Maestro! Don't leave us, you foolish children, any longer! And Fa and Yusuf have disappeared... Boring...
What topic? If it's about random processes in general, I wouldn't advise you to go into a lot of formulae, it's not very useful, it's more important to understand what you're doing.
What topic? If about random processes in general, I would not advise to go deep into the formulae, it is of little use, it is more important to understand the essence of what you are doing.
Somewhere I also said it, or wrote to someone, the main thing is to understand the process, and the formula will be found. Yes, on the subject of random processes, control, boundary states of these processes at transition from one to another, well something like that, your experience will prompt)))
But for Markovian processes there are diffusion equations. Everything is clear and straightforward.
And why not apply classical algorithms to Markovian processes?
http://speech-text.narod.ru/chap4_2.html
Why can't classical algorithms be applied to Markov processes?
http://speech-text.narod.ru/chap4_2.html
If there was a pseudo-Markovian process they would have already applied it, but VisSim seems to be unable to dig it out now)
If there was a pseudo-mark process, it would have been applied by now, but VisSim seems to be unable to get it out now)