From theory to practice - page 253
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You'll have to forgive me. But don't you think you're overdoing it here. It seems there's a competition going on to see who's smarter than the other. Here's the easiest tip. You go in with a lot that suits you, you make 10 points in a deal, close half of it, and the rest goes in the bank. And you will be happy. And no headaches)))
If you open brackets and remove common multipliers))), science is the same as religion and so one must start any business from far away, from the cosmic depths of space, and perhaps even further ...))
The creative process, you know...
ET for sure)))
It will then degenerate into such an indie, if you open the brackets and remove common multipliers)))) All the same, science as well as religion is sacred and therefore one must start any business from afar, from the cosmic depths of space, and maybe even further ...))
Trading in the market is much easier than you and I think
Trading in the market is much easier than you and I think
You'll have to forgive me. But don't you think you're overdoing it here. It seems there's a competition going on to see who's smarter than the other. Here's the easiest tip. You go in with a lot that suits you, you make 10 points in a deal, close half of it, and the rest goes in the bank. And you will be happy. You don't have a headache.)
Are you inspired by Shemyakin and Picasso?
Trading in the market is much simpler than you and I think
difficult to translate into auto-trading, so to speak.
you just need some kind of a heuristic that people have been looking for for decades.
one day they come across a few pairs and then it's a bummer.
wouldn't it be easier to go back?
Learned from Shemyakin and Picasso?
Joke accepted
difficult to translate into auto-trading, so to speak.
you just need some kind of heuristic that people have been looking for for decades.
Once they stumble upon it, they try it on a few pairs and then it's a bummer.
wouldn't it be easier to go back?
A man has always been (and still is) inherently greedy. If you succeed on one pair, then trade it (in general).
Man has always been (and still is) inherently greedy. If it works out on one pair, then trade it (in general).
Yep
just trade on several pairs, especially an automatic one - this is at least a truckload of knowledge and experience needed
You need a truckload of knowledge and experience - and on the forex, it takes years and money to get thereYep
Trading on several pairs, especially with an automated system, requires at least a truckload of knowledge and experience.
I think it takes years and my own money to get there.I agree, it's a good experience. And the psychological conditioning is also quite good.