From theory to practice - page 1227
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Alexander! If you don't mind, please send us the formula for the confidence interval you are using now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance_gamma_process
I use a formula to calculate variance for this process. When (theta^2)*v = sigma^2 is equal, it is the Einstein-Smoluchowski formula.
Have you started a popular thread without me?
AK is already chopping dough. Grijali is squeezed between his legs.
What do we poor people have to do? He promised a mountain of gold. Or did he mean woe?
Have you started a popular thread without me?
AK is already chopping dough. Griali is squeezed between his legs.
What are we poor people supposed to do? He promised a mountain of gold. Or did he mean woe?
Well, Vova... I'll tell you in good conscience, in good faith. In private. No witnesses, so to speak.
For starters, the current result:
Not much, of course... Well, that's the way it is.
So - the algorithm for such a TC is explicitly or implicitly there in this thread. But to achieve it, one had to actively participate in the discussions, read, ask questions, do the tasks I gave out, do my own independent research, etc. etc.
Alas, we saw none of that, with the rarest of exceptions. Stupidity, tin-eyes, secrecy and dibs is what was here.
The algorithm of my TS I can give only a few people - Asaulenko, Koldun, Vladimir and a few more on their personal request in the PM. The rest - a principled NO. They do not deserve it.
Though it's never too late to set things right. I very much hope and expect that there will be some brave, desperate guys who will conduct open research, share knowledge, etc. Not in this thread, but in another thread. And I will help them.
And for this branch the logical conclusion has come.
That's it.
Well, Vova... I'll tell you in good conscience, in good faith. Tête-à-tête. No witnesses, as they say.
For starters, the current result:
Not much, of course... Well, that's the way it is.
So - the algorithm for such a TC is explicitly or implicitly there in this thread. But to achieve it, one had to actively participate in the discussions, read, ask questions, do the tasks I gave out, do my own independent research, etc. etc.
Alas, we saw none of that, with the rarest of exceptions. Stupidity, tin-eyes, secrecy and dibs is what was here.
The algorithm of my TS I can give only a few people - Asaulenko, Koldun, Vladimir and a few more on their personal request in the PM. The rest - a principled NO. They do not deserve it.
Though it's never too late to set things right. I very much hope and expect that there will be some brave, desperate guys who will conduct open research, share knowledge, etc. Not in this thread, but in another thread. And I will help them.
And for this branch the logical conclusion has come.
That's it.
You are bluffing.
This is far from the edge of fiction
That's it.
Absolutely everything I have said can also be redirected to you. What is this graph about, what does it say to the "inhabitants" is not clear. Are there any stops? If not, where is the exit with a loss? What are the drawdowns? The fact that the ticks move slower in time on the edges - is it a grail?) I've got it, I've got it... Is it a grail - I don't know. The topic of tits is not solved)))) it's not like it's a secret if it's all Izzy's.))))))))))
Please give me the full list))))))
Absolutely everything I have said can also be redirected to you. What is this graph about, what does it say to the "inhabitants" is not clear. Do you have stops? If not, where is the exit with a loss? What are the drawdowns? The fact that the ticks move slower in time on the edges - is it a grail?) I've got it, I've got it... Is it a grail - I don't know. The topic of tits is not solved)))) it's not like it's a secret if it's all Izzy's.))))))))))
Please give me the full list))))))
I, for example, during all yesterday could not open one single order (in addition to many open ones) because of requotes. The order did not open manually or automatically. It was only on a real account. Everything was opened on a demo account without any problems, including the same automatic mode.
Graal at me or not, that's the question ?
;)
0 03:21:13.467 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:13.763 '...': requote 0.9269 / 0.9285 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:25.716 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:25.979 '...': requote 0.9269 / 0.9285 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:47.393 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:47.684 '...': requote 0.9269 / 0.9285 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:53.144 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:53.407 '...': requote 0.9269 / 0.9285 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:22:37.922 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
................
................
0 07:37:41.538 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9275 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 07:37:41.819 '...': requote 0.9274 / 0.9290 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9275 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 07:37:41.819 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9274 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 07:37:42.069 '...': requote 0.9274 / 0.9290 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9274 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
..........
ордер так и не открылся!
I mean:
- if you start to trade properly, then you are stupidly not given?
I, for example, was NOT able to open one single order (in addition to several open ones) during the whole of yesterday, because there was a requote. The order did not open manually or automatically. It was only on a real account. Everything was opened on a demo, without any problems, including the same automatic opening.
Do I have the grail or not, that's the question ???
;)
0 03:21:13.467 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:13.763 '...': requote 0.9269 / 0.9285 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:25.716 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:25.979 '...': requote 0.9269 / 0.9285 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:47.393 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:47.684 '...': requote 0.9269 / 0.9285 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:53.144 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:21:53.407 '...': requote 0.9269 / 0.9285 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 03:22:37.922 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9269 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
................
................
0 07:37:41.538 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9275 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 07:37:41.819 '...': requote 0.9274 / 0.9290 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9275 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 07:37:41.819 '...': instant order sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9274 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
0 07:37:42.069 '...': requote 0.9274 / 0.9290 for open sell 0.01 AUDCAD at 0.9274 sl: 0.0000 tp: 0.0000
..........
ордер так и не открылся!
that is:
- If you start trading correctly, they won't let you do it?
Slippage?
not
I tried it with the knobs too, it wouldn't open.
In the end I put two pending orders around the price (they opened, strange as it may seem)
One went off, then closed the other one
;)
Now I'm trying to figure out (simulating) - what was so good about this order...
... The subject of tits is unresolved)))) It's not like Izzy's a secret))))))))))
(All the spsk, please)))))))
))) Я. Ya.