From theory to practice - page 1192

 
Anatolii Zainchkovskii:

Some regularities do not last long (half a year, a year, two years), so it's silly to look for a grail on the history of 10-20 years, the style of trading and the era is changing...

I agree with this

but the grail does not care about these regularities

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

there's one in the methaca.

By the way, the pound is even older, it's just that there is no history in mt under 72

Yeah, and it's OK that the EUR has been a single currency since 1971))

 
Martin Cheguevara:

Yeah, it's not a big deal that EUR has been a common currency since 1971))

By the way, this question is answered in one of my threads

it's just that i've taken it off my profile

you run it, it'll sell out

or wait 12 years and close the gap

I've got the history of the eve in my head.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

By the way, this question is answered in one of my threads

I just cut it off my profile

you should run it and it will lose you money

of course she would have lost if she had not correctly found fat tails;) she would have definitely lost like 99% of traders;)

 
Martin Cheguevara:

Of course it would if it didn't find fat tails correctly;) it would definitely lose like 99% of traders;)

I used to go through the whole story with EAs

However, the maximum profit was under 300% in the entire history

and the worst thing is that the only order of 0.01 (dead time) may lose up to $100 000 easily
 
Martin Cheguevara:

I have now reached 200% in 4 months. Although I have written the code so that the robot opens trades at a distance from an already profitable trade.

I want to dump it, but it's starting to make even more profit.

I just realized today, that the essence is not that due to inefficiency the price goes backwards as quickly as before, but the noisier the more likely to earn in any direction just by waiting a bit (15-60 minutes) if you do everything right.

the GENERAL Noise. and Noise is achieved by finding the right FULL TAIL.

this is the conventional wisdom...

standard approach

and statistics tell us that most of them are leaking.
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

that's the conventional wisdom...

standard approach

not really

it's times like this when the market is dumping EVERYTHING. and it's very fast.

and i'm just taking advantage of it...

if i get it right of course...

 
Martin Cheguevara:

notice the noise after such pulses:

no surprise there.

that's how it should be in some cases, but only in some cases

you can see the results of the "takeover" strategy

if your two distributions are turned from vertical to horizontal, in principle, it would be...

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

no surprise there.

it may be so in some cases, but only in some cases

you can see the results of the "takeover" strategy

what kind of a takeover is it ... as i see the impulse - the pullback works, but within 5-10 minutes, 15 minutes maximum and that's it. who had time, had time and who didn't, lost on the strong trend. that's all ... what other takeover strategies?

My robot is very good at identifying takeovers as well. But the reliability of such a signal, even a very good one, is extremely low.
 
Martin Cheguevara:

What kind of takeover is there ... As I see it, the impulse - a pullback is effective, but within 5-10 minutes, 15 minutes maximum, and that's it... Who had time, had time and who didn't, lost on the strong trend... that's it ... what other takeover strategy is there?

You should do it again from the 72nd, don't bullshit people.

you don't have to try, reduce the risk or whatever, it won't live up to your expectations.

bye, i'm off to bed.

Reason: