Is the netminder difficult? - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
That's enough, I'll do it myself if I have to. Can you do it?
Thanks in advance.
Can I do it without libraries?
He can't do it without them.
No, all the account parameters will be enough, and I'll show you a moose.
Your description is still unclear, unfortunately.
Yes, I have such a thing.
Writing in classes is very handy. It hides a lot of routine code from view. It's a pity if you haven't understood this yet. Therefore, your description goes to hell, and your ideas are no longer accepted for consideration in this thread.
...
4) if price has moved against us by the step value
2 order lot * martin
3 order lot
4 order lot * martin
5 order-lot * martin
5) 5 order lot * martin
5) if in our direction by the value of the step
do exactly the same as in point 4
...
What do you mean? Does this mean placing a grid of pending orders to either side of the current price (.Limit and .Stop orders)?
How should we understand it? Does it mean placing a grid of pending orders to both sides of the current price (.Limit and .Stop orders)?
buy pounddollar at the current rate in steps of 200
1.60000
if the price is 1.60200
open a buy (sell) order
if the price is 1.60400
Open an order in the same side.
I also remember about the following nuance:
The grid is closed and new ones should not be opened until there is a new signal.
buy pounddollar at the current rate in steps of 200
1.60000
if the price is 1.60200
open a buy (sell) order
if the price is 1.60400
we open an order in the same direction
Is it so difficult to write in a way that is understandable :) ? Five lines, but there are several ways to implement it.
Is it so hard to write in plain language :) ? Five lines, and there are several ways to implement them.
We have a net broker and the next order is opened depending on the previous one
We do not just throw orders with a certain step - we do it to move the average entry into a position according to the grid
That is, even if the price makes 600 moves in our direction, we will count the money (or raise a loss if not there)
at least a triple lot
the practice - in the case of a trend earlier cover trade in the case if against - at the first retracement
this is essentially the same martingale only softer
A typical conversation between a typical freelance customer and a contractor.
Hell. Just Hell ... But informative ;)
We have a gridiron, and there the next order is opened depending on the previous one
We do not just throw orders with a certain step - we do it to move the average entry into a deal on the grid
That is, even if the price makes 600 moves in our direction, we will count the money (or raise a loss if we go the wrong way)
at least a triple lot
the practice - in the case of a trend earlier cover the deal in the case against - at the first retracement
this is essentially the same as martingale but softer.
Once again - what kind of pending orders expose? The types of pending orders:
In other words, placing pending Limit orders we hope for a pullback, placing pending Stop orders we hope for trend continuation.
Once again, which pending orders do we place? Types of pending orders:
In other words, by placing pending Limit orders we hope for a pullback, by placing pending Stop orders we hope for a continuation of the trend.
No, we only enter the market in the direction of the first order when the level is reached (price of the first + step)
I don't understand where the idea of pending orders comes from