Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 579

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Genghis, I already know how this thing works and what will happen next, and what kind of deposit it needs

Your right.

 
CHINGIZ MUSTAFAEV:

Your right.

"The robot uses the effect of time-dependent price movements. It calculates the probability of a reversal and, at the point of maximum probability, opens and independently escorts trades."

And how do you break this stratum? How is it the easiest to lose?

The reversal did not take place in the calculated point. What will he do? To average? Will he close the loss at once? Or leave the drawdown and use other symbols to reach the bottom? What are the other options? Ah,a lock).

And Genghis - neither option will work. It will. If you don't refill. And it depends on the amount... There will be a point of no return, when the share makes no sense: either the maximum amount of transactions has been reached, or the amount of the share is not affordable).

Well, if you take a breakdown, for example. Or if you swing with small lots. So, there is both flat and swaps. I don't know.

What kind of robot do you have, how do you lose it, have you thought about it?

 
JohnGoodtrade:

"The robot uses the effect of time-dependent price movements. It calculates the probability of a reversal and, at the point of maximum probability, opens and independently escorts trades."

And how can this stratum be broken? How is it the easiest to lose?

The reversal did not take place in the calculated point that was far away and immediately. What will he do? Mediate? Will he close the loss at once? Or leave the drawdown and use other symbols to reach the bottom? What are the other options? Ah,the lock).

Keep guessing.)

Everything is much more interesting and simple there. We abandoned this robot when we found a more interesting phenomenon.

 
Ognemiroff:

Keep guessing.)

it's much more interesting and simple. We abandoned this robot when we found a more interesting phenomenon.

No, sir, you havedeversification. And it's definitely making a profit of about 60%.

This is trolling. Relevant.
 
JohnGoodtrade:

No, sir, you havedeversification. And it's definitely making a profit, about 60%.

I'm telling you that this scheme exists) I used it before I went into robotics.

 
Ognemiroff:

I'm telling you this scheme exists) I used it before I got into robotics.

It's simple, though, bro. If you have different strategies. All 10 bots won't sell out at the same time. On average, 4 out of 10 will lose at the same time and not every month. I used the scheme for about 2 years. and a year before that on HYIPs (just in different ones).

 
Ognemiroff:

it's easy, though, bro. If you have radically different strategies. All 10 bots won't all sell out at the same time. On average, 4 out of 10 will lose at the same time and not every month. I used the scheme for about 2 years. and a year before that on HYIPs (just in different ones).

If you trade one lot of fixes all the time, like breakdowns. If you trade one lot with fixes all the time, i.e. breakdowns, you will reach the point where you have to return the deposit. You will get into a slowdown or your robot will get into a slowdown. The risk if you make a huge deposit on your own without any credit... It is possible. But this is not a brokerage house. And it is not difficult to lock oneself in perpetual investor, when no one buys more. Not to dump the stock.

You need to be in the know and to know where the money is. You have to be a part of the crowd. There is no other way.

 
JohnGoodtrade:

If you trade one lot of fx all the time, such as breakdowns. You'll get to the point where you have to deposit more money. You will get into a slowdown or your robot) It is the same for all strats. The risk if the deposit is huge and on your own without any credit... Maybe. But this is not a brokerage house. And it is not difficult to lock oneself in perpetual investor, when no one buys more. Not to dump the stock.

You need to be in the know and to know where the money is. You have to be a part of the crowd. Otherwise there is no way.

There is one feature of the bot that avoids the volatile parts of the market. Plus another peculiarity related to short-term/long-term. The chance of losing 0.01% and tends to zero. Over 10 years, plum sections appeared 2-3 times. It is not the moment of plummeting that you described. We are not satisfied with this robot in terms of profit / drawdown ratio. I have never been used to buy such trading robots, I don't know why I decided to buy them. It is certainly not a tester grail, but a good project.

You should also forget about breakouts. Technical analysis is not used there.

 
Ognemiroff:

There is a feature in the bot that avoids volatile parts of the market. Plus there is also a feature related to the short term/long term. The chance of a drain is 0.01 per cent and tends to zero. Over 10 years, plum sections appeared 2-3 times. It is not the moment of plummeting that you described. We are not satisfied with this robot in terms of profit / drawdown ratio. I have never been used to buy such trading robots, I don't know how to check their performance. It is certainly not a tester grail, but a good project.

You should also forget about breakouts. Technical analysis is not used there.

You should trade volatility and volumes. And there, where there are a lot of participants from different sides. You have to do it on the movements. You may use Insider, or luck, or the MM will do it.

And in general you need TA to find an appropriate point to buy stocks. And more often there is a breakdown after the squeeze as an entry point. Well, I've only learned that so far. It's the statements and so on that decide. Fundamentals in short, not TA.

TA is intraday for stocks "in play" and that's the minimum, you need to know the glass and how to use it correctly...

There are also options and other chips, you have to learn... It is not so easy)) There's a lot of strategy there. And those who are cool are not all on top ;)

And you're talking about a forex bot?

 
JohnGoodtrade:

You have to trade volatility as well as volume. And where there are many participants from different sides. You have to trade volatility and volume, and where there are a lot of participants from different sides. The rest is either insider trading, or luck, or MM will take care of it.

And in general you need TA to find an appropriate point to buy stocks. And more often there is a breakdown after the squeeze as an entry point. Well, I've only learned that so far. It's the statements and so on that decide. Fundamentals in short, not TA.

TA is intraday for stocks "in play" and that's the minimum, you have to know the glass and how to use it correctly...

Fundamental robot we have) is ridiculous bullshit. More often than not, analysts and insiders are trying illusions.

Regarding the answer to your question with volatility and volumes. This order system works better on pullbacks after trends (on trends in the other direction). The pivot points are very accurate, 9 out of 10 are true. I trade by them manually. I use the parameter potential of the current movement, which is calculated on the basis of the market movement. And it will be either right away or in 100 points maximum. Why do not fix the loss? The order system compensates for losses. There is no martin, no averaging, and no oversleeping. The whole order system is looped.

Almost a grail, but not ideal. One has to manage to lose money on it. They have abandoned the trading robot because the risks/profits cannot be increased proportionally. To put it simply, it may not yield more than 10-15 percent a month, with drawdown below 20 percent.

There is always that balance. Either you sacrifice profits to neutralize losses and get few signals. Or you overstate risks and catch unnecessary flaps and miss on them.

Reason: