Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 208

 
moskitman:
Sash, what are 23 short positions and 14 long positions?


Never mind - there are some other trades before and after, they are included in the report and not in this chart
 
Contender:


I do not need it.

I have a signal tied to the test, that's what I'm watching.

What exactly are you trying to prove, I don't understand. I have been dealing with multicurrency for the last couple of years, if you open everything with the same lot, it will be like Konstantin drew.

No, I don't. I'm not going to prove anything to anyone.
Yes, there are no questions, we disagree on the stability of the Ring's equitability behaviour. Let it stay that way.

I have simply used my own opinion and found a way to ensure that the equity of a basket of orders would be plus, while you continue to blindly persist.

Respectfully.

 
alexx_v:
never mind - there are other transactions before and after, they are included in the report and not in this graph
OK, put a simple one pair lock in there as well, eh?
 
moskitman:
OK, put a simple one-pair lock in there too, eh?


it won't show up, except for the spread.

I mean, it won't affect the chart, the lock is zero.

 
alexx_v:

It won't, except for the spread.

I mean, it won't affect the chart, the lock is zero.

Well, a triangle is essentially a lock and a ring, though...
 
moskitman:
A triangle is essentially a lock and a ring, however...


For a triangle to become a lot, you need to equate traded volumes (not lots!)

Here's a script to calculate lots of the same volume.

Files:
 

Contender:

...

Here's a script to calculate lots of one volume.

Thank you, of course, but I don't need it.
 
moskitman:
Thank you, of course, but I don't need it.


Well, don't talk about "essentially lock" when what you're talking about isn't essentially lock.
 
moskitman:
A triangle is essentially a lock and a ring, though...

But the lock on one pair is zero, and the graph at zero is like a corpse's cardiogram.
 
Contender:
Well, don't talk about "essentially lock" when what you're talking about is essentially not lock.

OK, I won't. )))

Anyway, I'll unbalance my "non-lock" almost from the beginning anyway, and I'm interested only in the dynamics of price behaviour - whether they go "from the start" (Inhale) or return to OrderOpenPrice() .

Reason: