Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 173

 
Equity drawdowns present, but not catastrophic............
 

I don't agree a bit about the lack of fish. There are fish, but they are small and often leave:)
Joker probably meant the obvious eurusd, gbpusd, eurgbp lows.
But in general inside the channel - not so much:).

And about shares in the legs only some people have understood it (maybe nobody understood it to the end).
In theory, it looks like this:
we add to the positive one, the negative one rests; the other one starts rising - vice versa;
both in minus - wait for them to go in the right direction, you can top up if the bifurcation grows;
when they went too far - most probably a rollover or a moose.

And so on, until the margin and/or the deposit run out:).
The threads of doubles trading are huge - it is impossible to tell everything in two lines.


 

ivandurak:

/*what to do if the synthetic has crossed two sigmas and is not going to come back?


I will explain it in details.

I'm telling you, portfolio-equity is a regular price chart

The only good thing about portfolio-equity is that the drawdown is not as big as in one currency pair, it lets you stay afloat longer

It is the same whether you use portfolio equities or single currency, it is equally complicated

i found out that the top chart shows how to trade which bottom chart shows several symbols as an indicator, try to trade as well, you can even display portfolio equity as a bar chart of the timeframe, like the standard MT4 charts

and what we'll see... ...a regular price chart

Or, let's take EURUSD and GBPUSD and open EURGBP and see... the same chart, we can open 20 pairs and get another chart)

so one or 20 pairs may give us one advantage - synthetic pairs stay afloat longer

 
b2v2:

To 7Konstantin7:

NeKolla/Aleksander in another thread even taught you how to make money on a coin:) Don't be so conceited. Probably a billionaire by now:)


I tried to play the game with coins using his link, it was easy to make it up to + and it didn't work out the same way on fore.
 
7Konstantin7:

one good thing about synthetics is that they keep us afloat longer


exactly... if the strategy more or less justifies itself, the number of pairs does not let it die, but steadily fills the deposit...

it's not the same... I have 24 pairs and I haven't run to the monitor for a long time, only waking up to see if it's blown out... :-)))

 
zoritch:


Exactly... If the strategy more or less justifies itself, the number of pairs does not let it die, but steadily fills the deposit ...

it's not the same... I have 24 couples and haven't run to the monitor in a long time, only waking up to see if it's blown out... :-)))


Yeah))) if there's a strategy, it's better to apply it to lots of pairs, it's just that many people here don't understand and are trying to squeeze something out of portfolio equity

so what is a lot of pairs in the form of a graph, i found a picture indicator i can't find it, it is from the t101 system in this indicator about 10 pairs are shown in one graph

in fact it is a usual chart not different from one pair

So, as TEX said even if you are a dick or not a dick, you'll get a dick :D

I'm not talking to you zoritch

 

It's been a long time since I came here, probably about half a year, and it's always the same everywhere, just like in all the porn trading shitholes))). One-actor theatre, a few constantly weaving behind him admirers and critics who have been on the topic for years, but still persist in these topics (cloaca).

As for the topic itself, I'll quote myself )))

"Myself a long time tortured recycle horseradish, but unfortunately nothing good came out of it.

When the spread approaches the level, the chances of the synthetic bouncing back into the channel are about 50%, at least on my demo it was like that. In order for the spread to continue to walk in the channel, the volatility of each currency pair entering it should be the same as in the period which the recurrence was calculated for that spread. But the volatility of each pair is as much unknown in the future as any other exchange instrument. There is even a volatility futures on CME, which also has unpredictable trends and flops.
To put it simply, all this dancing around the spread is nothing more than trading volatility, and it is unpredictable."

I wrote for a few days on another forum and from which I have now come here to look at the new miracle, a certain joker... But I see no miracle, there are only old acquaintances and their methods of whetting the sheep's interest are the same as 3 years ago.

 

Constantine - not really.

There are instruments (not on forex) that are virtually guaranteed to build a return synthetic, i.e. cointegrated.
Currency pairs (unless you take eurusd, gbpusd, eurgbp combinations) clearly do not belong to them.
But the properties of statistical synthetics may be very different from those of even crosses.
In the spread picture above there are 4 clearly plus returns from 2 SCEs to the green line in 2 weeks. Quite decent, it seems to me.

Of course it is top notch to count synthetics of 35 majors every 5 minutes (or 15 minutes), check for cointegration according to various criteria, and filter them.
Even analysts at market makers don't do that. Or they keep silent - they have signatures of non-disclosure and non-exile from usa:)
And I quite accept that an 80% probability of triggering is achievable. Synthetics only need to be traded once and you don't need it anymore.
Another thing is that some people make such percentage of deals in (+) on one pair.

P.S.
What about the coin? Really could increase by 100 times?

 
wersuk:


Simply put, all this dancing around the spread, is nothing else but trading volatility, and it is unpredictable.


It's true that whether you use one pair or a bunch of pairs, you can't guess the future.

Well, at least someone else explained to people) because I do not always understand how to write

 
I understand that cointegration is not fucking necessary.... having read the same dickhead... the same strategy regardless on a large number of pairs...
Reason: