You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
reminds me of a bloated Augustin Louis Cauchy or Pierre-Simon Laplace.
And this?
And this?
And this?
this one is obviously closer to Gaussian with some distortions
the mode is not the same as the median and the mean.
there's some obvious asymmetry to the positive side.
the kurtosis is noticeably less pronounced than the previous one.
We can suppose that it is a later time slice, hence the big "blurring".
it is also interesting that there are almost no thick tails
the shift probably (undoubtedly) corresponds to the case when the portfolio by inertia continues the trend movement
(all this information comes from talking mushrooms)
You're going in the right direction with a couple more years of work and you'll realise what's really in that distribution.or maybe even earlier.
this one is obviously closer to Gaussian with some distortions
the mode is not the same as the median and the mean
there is some obvious asymmetry to the positive side
the kurtosis is noticeably less pronounced than in the previous one.
We can suppose that it is a later time slice, hence the big "blurring".
it is also interesting that there are almost no thick tails
the shift probably (undoubtedly) corresponds to the case when the portfolio by inertia continues the trend movement
(all these data have been obtained from talking mushrooms)
Here.........
And this?
this beginning, which will drag in the statistics and the probability of
will delay the entry exit by a certain distance, respectively, for a certain period of time
but the market doesn't care about that
the market is a classic, supply and demand.
which means a certain percentage of false entries because the probability will not equal 1.
the more correct way is to evaluate supply and demand and go with the market rather than against it
this start, which will draw in the statistics and probability
will delay the entry exit by a certain distance, respectively for a certain period of time
but the market doesn't care about that
the market is unfortunately a classic - supply and demand
this start, which will draw in the statistics and probability
will delay the entry exit by a certain distance, respectively for a certain period of time
but the market doesn't care about that
the market is a classic, supply and demand, as unfortunate as it may seem
which means a certain percentage of false entries because the probability will not equal 1.
the more correct way is to evaluate supply and demand and go with the market rather than against it
the shift probably (undoubtedly) corresponds to the case where the portfolio continues to trend by inertia
(all this information comes from talking mushrooms)
I think that the Prophet Anatoly sees the truth in the dynamic representation of the probability density between currency pairs. For asymmetry is the mystery behind the Seven Seals... Only a select few, who have watched too many PDF cartoons, can afford to proclaim the advent of a new era, the Grail Era.
Are you actually alluding to the question of whether to drink or not to drink?
If you're asking about champagne, you'd rather go to a casino.
but I'm asking how to make money.
I mean, get to the bottom of it, get to the point - why not 1?
for a start i suggest everyone find out what the price increment is ???? // except yourself of course ;)
for a tip (echoing the question of the post, eh? ;)))) ...
10 buyers entered the market, will there be a price increase?
second question:
how to formalise the price increment into the new volume of buyers entering the market?
I will answer in advance:
the price increment ( naturally)is a multiple of the volume !!! - it's in the frame !!!