Not the Grail, just a regular one - Bablokos!!! - page 415

 

trading from the boundaries of the channel - don't know what fish are out there and Joe wrote that he found something\.

Truth alone is in a different field and doomed to one in search of it.

This channel has a way of breaking and reducing the mate expectation to zero.

more or less stable channels are formed on economically related assets/instruments such as equities, but that's different
 
Ilmir Galiev:

trading from the boundaries of the channel - don't know what fish are out there and Joe wrote that he found something\.

it's complicated there, too, and it's a lot of work to do

the truth alone is in a different field and doomed to be found alone

that's right, it's not a team effort, it's troublesome and complicated, but people want to make a buck out of the blue, as usual

I've made my own dough so far:



The risk per trade is less than 1%, the ratio of profits to losses is about 50/50, and the size of loss is 2 times less than profit (or something like that), chart with re-investment, Drimmer is beating his chest and shouting: "I don't believe it! It doesn't happen!", but he is a known skeptic, which is generally useful, especially in this business.
And yes, it's synthetic, for the simple reason that it's better to adjust the market to yourself than to adjust to the market.

 

Will there be a profit?

It would be very desirable to have a profit,

how about a profit?

 
transcendreamer:

Will there be a profit?

It would be very desirable to have a profit,

How about a profit?

Buy a lottery ticket already, "#;%! (c) the anecdote about God losing his temper at the poor Jew's eternal whining

 
transcendreamer:

Will there be a profit?

It would be very desirable to have a profit,

how about a profit?

You need to look at the state, not the earnings project.

and there isn't one.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

the state should be watched, not the earnings project

but it is absent

I will make a monitor (exclusively) in the signals (although maybe not in the signals - I do not like to lose trades, well, not at all), and during the week I will make the state

 
Aleksandr Volotko:

I will make a monitor (exclusively) in the signals (although maybe not in the signals - I don't like scamming trades, well, not at all), and in the week there will be a state

OK
 
advise whether it's worth it for real or not.


Symbol:
BR-10.18
Period:M15 (2018.08.01 - 2018.09.28)



Broker:
Otkritie Broker JSC
Currency:RUB
Initial deposit:250 000.00
Leverage:1:1
Results
Quality of story:100%
Bars:2305Tiki:8250Characters:1
Net profit:252 873.01Absolute drawdown on balance:0.00Absolute drawdown by funds5 237.75
Total profit:315 841.90Maximum drawdown on balance:14 796.38 (3.05%)Maximum drawdown of funds:26 378.14 (5.35%)
Total loss:-62 968.89Relative drawdown on balance sheet:4.19% (11 051.80)Relative drawdown on funds:6.29% (16 917.63)
Profitability:5.02Expectation of winning:4 682.83Margin level:99.75%
Recovery Factor:9.59Sharpe Ratio:0.44Z-score:-2.22 (97.36%)
AHPR:1.0135 (1.35%)LR Correlation:0.97OnTester Result:0
GHPR:1.0130 (1.30%)LR Standard Error:25 316.24
Total trades:54Short trades (% of winners):14 (57.14%)Long trades (% of winners):40 (57.50%)
Total trades:108Profitable trades (% of all trades):31 (57.41%)Loss trades (% of all):23 (42.59%)
Largest profitable trade:43 406.78Largest losing trade:-8 799.28
Average profitable trade:10 188.45Average losing trade:-2 737.78
Maximum number of continuous wins (profit):8 (86 178.69)Maximum number of continuous losses (loss):5 (-14 796.38)
Maximum number of continuous profits (number of wins):107 613.93 (5)Max. continuous loss (number of losses):-14 796.38 (5)
Average continuous winnings:3Average Continuous Losses:3






Correlation (Profits,MFE):0.93Correlation (Profits,MAE):0.27Correlation (MFE,MAE):0.0690


Minimum holding time of a position:0:00:01Maximum position holding time:22:45:00Average position holding time:3:39:11


 

Yurii Tebenkov:

Advice on whether or not to go for real.

If that question arises in principle - 10000% no, of course.

 
Aleksandr Volotko:

If such a question arises in principle - 10000% no, of course.

If the question arises in principle - 10000% no... If the question arises in principle -10000% no...
Reason: