Ward 6 - page 16
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
...probably can't do without averaging, or am I misunderstanding something?
First of all. We built a filter - let's apply this algorithm to two pairs and see the cross. And it may turn out that "does not lag" (by eye) in pairs themselves, does not lag in relation (!!!), and lags in product. If you can make it so that it does not lag (by eye) both in the relation and in the product - as in the picture - this is a step forward. Although on the picture there are lagging filters :-)
So there you go. I wanted to show one of the old ideas. Where it is not immediately obvious that everything is based on SMA. Which is inevitable if you average data from the past in any way, even in a very twisted way.
So: let us introduce two curves. EURUSD and GBPUSD. I will further call them conditionally ED and PD. Can someone draw some additional curves, EDq (it will be drawn in the ED chart) and PDq (we will draw it in the PD chart), such that the difference of EDq and PDq should be leading the difference of ED and PD by some predetermined number of bars (let it be a bar), and the sums coincide: EDq+PDq = ED+PD. Can anyone? :-)
P.S. Am I the only one who can't get to the "profile"? Clicking on this link always ends in an error. Can't even put in an avatar.
https://www.mql5.com/ru/users/dr.drain/
For nonlinear filters, unlike linear filters, there is no strictly proven prohibition in principle on the existence of a "non-delayed smoothing filter".
You may be extremely surprised, but there is no such proof for linear filters either.
(Actually, it all depends on the filtering signal - and in both cases).
You may be extremely surprised, but there is no such proof for linear filters either.
(Actually, it all depends on the filtering signal - and in both cases)
Reading this thread more and more, I am more and more convinced of the contradictory personality of the topic-starter. On the one hand the pictures from MathCAD and clever arguments about probability show impressive baggage of knowledge
Well, one should remember not unknown hero of our forum, who can write formulas and clever article and set impressive aims)))) For example his own electric power station
https://www.mql5.com/ru/users/dr.drain/
Yeah. And there I select "edit" and it takes me to https://www.mql4.com/ru/users/edit/Dr.Drain to nowhere.
You may be extremely surprised, but there is no such proof for linear filters either.
(Actually, it all depends on the filtering signal - and in both cases)
For linear ones, there is. Strictly. Long before you. There's even a theorem. What's a "filtering signal"? 0_о