MT4 doesn't have long to live - page 30

 
Trolls:


That's where you're wrong. A man cannot always be right about everything.... back in 2006 you were told what was needed from the terminal, WHAT TRADERS WANT..... but it's still there. In some respects MT5 is worse than MT4, not to mention the competition ...

You'll get the hang of it in time. Time is a very good judge, you know. Don't make illusions for yourself and don't make illusions for others by comparing yourself with Appel. Appel has proved its decisions by the number of sales of its product... Can you brag about how many copies of MT5 you have sold?

I'm afraid to disappoint both you and the competition.

Look at the fourth comment from the beginning of the page https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/138465/page22


Z.U. I think your words, "soon programmers will start working for food ... "

The site has an excellent search engine. And it's very easy to type "food" into a search and enter the author's name. I checked - no word forms of "food" have been used anywhere.

I found the phrase "when you catch me working for food I'll program something", but it's not my phrase and I was just opposing it: https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/4301/page4#comment_88264

 
hrenfx:

No, I'm not going to do that. Your idea is to open a new thread and hear constructive criticism of the MT5 tester there. More specifically, where it will be shown that the MT5 tester is inaccurate. So open a branch with an appropriate name for your idea of impending fun. If you don't, I simply won't cite evidence for the existence of inaccuracies in the MT5 tester. That would be silence on both your part and mine. It is up to you.

It's not serious.

Prepare the evidence and start the branch with the first salvo, without letting it fill up with offtops. I'll wait for the first proof to appear and then gladly participate. I like this kind of vetting.

 

This is more than a serious suggestion to you specifically. From a practical point of view, I don't care about the MT5 tester's problems. For those, who want to write their own calculations, I opened a branch to think over some possible nuances.

If there is any interest in detecting inaccuracies in the MT5-tester, it belongs to you, as a developer. So if you have a desire - open a branch. No - let's not waste each other's time.

 
Renat:

This is not serious.

Prepare the evidence and start the branch with the first salvo, without letting it fill up with offtops. I'll wait for the first proof to appear and then gladly participate. I like this kind of vetting.

Me too. ))) This leads to fixing bugs and bugs in the terminal, but only if they are really there. )))
 
Renat:

I'm afraid to disappoint you and your competitors.

Look at the fourth comment from the top of the page https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/138465/page22


The site has an excellent search engine. And it's very easy to type "food" into the search and enter the author's name. I've checked it and I haven't found any word forms for "food".

I found the phrase "That's when you'd catch me programming something for food", but it's not my phrase and I was just opposing it: https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/4301/page4#comment_88264



wow

1. I worked with this terminal, or rather its prototype when it was not yet owned by Metakvotov...

2. I see and work with software better than you, sorry, but you can't achieve this in 100 years ... (by the way, not without your help found it :-))

3. like I do not know how to use search, so do not believe your eyes or what a link for you https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/4301/89045#comment_89045

just in case

Renat 2011.08.08 15:05 #

Incidentally, it may turn out that "programming for food" will soon be half of the world.

Everything is moving towards it.

I will not be disappointed ... but I'm sorry for your hard work. Sincerely. I've been trying to show it to you for years, but you have blinders over your eyes ... and what's worse, you don't want to take them off. You keep saying, we're the best and we know everything better than anyone else...

Time will judge. At this stage there is no mass migration to MT5...

 
Trolls:

2. I see and work with software higher than that on the head, sorry, but you can't achieve this in 100 years ... (I found it, by the way, not without your help :-))

Prival, can you give me a link to this "miracle"?
 
hrenfx:
Prival, can I get a link to this "miracle"?


it's not a miracle. C sharp, the standard C sharp that has all the power of microsoft behind it (ninja trader). And it is by far the most popular programming language.

and check this out https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/2072/21771#comment_21771

 
I'm sorry about the search, it turned out I hadn't read the next page. Of course, Priaval is in his repertoire, talking about unseen software. What does it have to do with us?
 
Trolls:

2. I see and work with software higher than that on the head, sorry, but you and 100 years to achieve this .... (I found it, by the way, not without your help :-))

What is this software? (here or in person, if possible).

Matlab? Ninjatrader?

 
Although I'm not crazy about MT5, I wouldn't compare ninza and matlab with MT5 due to incorrectness. We can only talk about the convenience of the trading API. Yes, the MT5 API has a disadvantage - you can't request a tick history even for an extreme period of time. It's not convenient, but not fatal. Trading API is API all the same, you can connect it to C#, or to Matlab, for that matter.
Reason: