Engineer Garin's Paraboloid - page 16
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
From the same place:
Applying the law of universal gravitation to explain the rotation of the planets is a separate fallacy, because this law names only one mythical force - gravitation - and a dynamic system of bodies can only be in equilibrium if there is an even number of balanced forces. We need a force to counteract gravitation.
It is here that the mountain-scientists introduced the mythical centrifugal force to counterbalance the mythical attraction!
Oh, he's telling the truth, the visionary... The law of even numbers alone... Why did I give up the grail?
From the same place:
Oh, he's telling the truth, the visionary...The law of even numbers alone... and why did I give up the grail?
By the way, these comrades were cautious in their conclusions from the start, and for good reason...
http://ru.euronews.net/2012/02/23/loose-cable-may-have-botched-cern-results/
/* Corrected the link - Vinin */
Hey, hey, whoa! Where the hell are you all going? Floodgate's in the next thread. Get to the point, gentlemen!
About the paraboloid: the indicator is alternating - up and down and up and down, etc. But one cannot use it just for rebound - either oscillation near the initial deposit or a slow drawdown. One cannot work only on the breakout - a flat sweep removes all trend achievements, and a flat, as many young naturalists believe, lasts 80% of the time. So, what should we do? That's right, enter the market with a pair of orders.
What does it give you? First, a confident entry - you know that you will always close the first order with a profit, regardless of the direction that the price will choose. This alone is an incentive. Second, you know that out of a pair of open orders only one of them can close with a loss and a part of the loss will be compensated by the first order which is always in the plus. In other words, the drawdown loss is smaller than in case of a single order. Thirdly, you will get double profit from one part of the price movement, as no one can argue that the price moves in a saw-tooth pattern, alternating the movement in one direction with reversals or reversals in the other. This happens because of natural market resistance because there are always opposite positions pushing the price back.
In the special case above where you are offered to enter with one order in the direction of the previous price move, you can easily slide into a flat or slow-moving market where candles from different directions alternate, which will result in a continuous losing streak for all of your open orders! In the case of a parabaloids, we work on the natural sawtooth price movement, and we are guaranteed to take the first move in profit.
There is no such thing as a centrifugal force. By the way, profitable ones don't happen very often either.
Witty)) (About the sandwich and its falling oil down))))))
Yes, not really - just producing oil and exploiting that force that some deny the existence of ;)... Funny thing turns out: butter is there, but you can't produce it: without the presence of such forces in the centrifuge, milk doesn't get separated ;) Where does the butter come from then? I wonder - let them explain ......
ZZY And immediately conclusion - if there is centrifugal force, then there are unprofitable loki ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))..... smiles missing ))))))))).....
That's right, enter the market with a pair of orders.
What does this do? Firstly, a sure entry - you know that you will always close the first order with a profit, regardless of the direction the price chooses. This alone is an incentive. Second, you know that out of a pair of open orders, only one of them can be closed with a loss and this loss will be partially compensated by the first order which is always in the plus. In other words, the drawdown loss is smaller than in case of a single order. Thirdly, if luck is good, you will get double profit from one part of the price movement - because no one can argue that the price moves in a saw-tooth pattern, alternating the movement in one direction with reversals or reversals in the other. This is due to natural market resistance, as there are always divergent positions that push the price back.
2 orders = 2 spreads + 2 swaps, when closing a profitable one, where is the guarantee that the price will go to you? and if you are good at finding the reversal point, then it is better to trade in the direction of a pullback with one order, as they do in the euronotes
Yes, not really - just producing oil and exploiting that force that some deny the existence of ;)... Funny thing turns out: oil is there, but you can't produce it: without the presence of such forces in the centrifuge, milk can't be separated ;) Where does the butter come from then? I wonder - let them explain ......
ZZY And immediately conclusion - if there is centrifugal force, then there are unprofitable loki ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))..... smiles missing ))))))))).....
Well then you've got a narrowly tailored gimmick((((
By the way, why not replace the word centrifugal with complex inertia
Well then that's a highly specialised trick you've got there((((
By the way, why not replace the word centrifugal with complex inertia
It's just the way it's worked out in theorematics: Centrifugal, which is the one that arises due to the presence of acceleration normal to the motion path - that is, when a uniform motion deviates from a straight path. If there are frictional forces, for example, or anchoring as in turbine disks or slings, or rolling on a surface (as in the car example) then according to Newton's 3rd law centripetal arises, but not per se - it is a reaction to the presence of centrifugal force. The difference in the examples: the car has centripetal - friction between the wheels and the road - and the car tilts; because centrifugal is a volumetric force and its equidistance is applied to the centre of mass, while centripetal is applied to the wheels - it is friction between the wheel and the road. But there is no centripetal force in milk, or rather, it is negligibly small (because drag force is small in liquid), and milk under the action of centrifugal force, without sufficient reaction force is divided into fractions, because particle masses are different - so you get butter, cream, sour cream and skimmed milk - the rest ))))))).
ZS, So this is - in general: unprofitable lokas do exist - proven )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Because centrifugal force exists ..... ))))))))))))))))))))))))))