Interesting and humorous - page 29

 
TheXpert:
Yeah

funny. and without the slots in the cubes and the wrap-around behind?

 
denis_orlov:

funny. and without the slots in the cubes and the wraparound behind?


almost solved.... (I got the basis for joining 1 to 1 and 2 to 2 from Integer, but slightly modified)

 
Why can't it be that easy on forensics? :)
 
wenay:


almost solved.... (I borrowed the basic method of connecting 1 to 1 and 2 to 2 from Integer, although I modified it slightly)

Almost how? Almost there :) +5 :)
 
I can't modernise the way of connecting 3 to 3, so as not to deviate from the basics; (the basis for connecting 1 to 1 and 2 to 2 was taken from Integer, although I modernised it slightly)
 
denis_orlov: funny. and without the slots in the cubes and the wraparound behind?

Here, try and prove that it's not possible.
 

You solved it, didn't you? You solved it by five points. Why are you putting the red line down to one now? Is it jammed? ;)

 

found a way out of this situation)))

applause, curtain call

 
rustein:
Almost how? Resolved :) +5 :)


Reminds me of Warcraft - escort the hero from point A to point B...:-)

 
drknn:

You decided, didn't you - why did you put the red line in one? You're jammed? ;)


i see you're getting fancy, you've drawn a new fourth lane........... =)

maybe on the market side we are also looking the wrong way?

Reason: