The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 486

 

SB = equilibrium insofar as it cannot be capitalised on: there are no stable trends, no cycles, no patterns, i.e. no regularities at all where the market is absolutely efficient. Therefore, any participant has neither an advantage nor a weakness, everyone is equal. That is, it is an equilibrium of speculative opportunity through its complete absence. This is obviously a utopian and unattainable state because market efficiency grows with the number of participants and liquidity available, but since the number of participants and liquidity cannot be infinite, the market will never achieve absolute randomness/efficiency either, although it will strive for it. Therefore, the assertion that the market is often (how often? how much? how do we even measure it?) in a state of SS seems dubious, especially without the emphasis on high liquidity as a key efficiency parameter.

But as an unattainable model ideal of equilibrium in the SB, it is fine. Here at least the meaning and mechanics of the state are clear. The market objective Y = const, that's really a load of nonsense and nonsense. Even in the days of gold coins people were shaking the stationary price as much as they could, sharpening and filing coins :), let alone free markets.

 

Man, this thread is ten years old and some people are still trying/hope to make money off of randoms 😁🤣😆

Now that's what I understand dangerous sectarians...

(Really just illiterate and rigid psyche)

Better to go to the factory...

 
Alexander_K2:

What judgement?

You've started to bring in SB everywhere you can. You even went so far as to define the equilibrium state of the market as SB. Hence the conclusion - you are completely unfamiliar with physics, you don't even understand the meaning of the word "equilibrium". And you think you are educated and I am obliged to gain respect from you? You think too highly of yourself...

You constantly interfere with my colleagues-physicists and utter childish babble known to all. How am I supposed to respond to you?

What do you want? Or are you drunk all the time? I honestly don't understand.

The application of mathematical approaches to economics gave birth to econometrics. What science was born of applying physical approaches toeconomics?

How many conferences on that science have you attended? Or at least familiarised yourself with the proceedings? Which Russian scientists involved in this science do you know?

Who in the world are the leading specialists in this science? How many books have you read on this subject? Or the Chukcha is not a reader, the Chukcha is a writer.

You are a dull ignoramus and boast of it. You don't read anything and so you think you're Columbus. I draw that conclusion from the nonsense and aplomb you've been peddling here.

 
transcendreamer:

Man, this thread is ten years old and some people are still trying/hope to make money off of randoms 😁🤣😆

Now that's what I understand dangerous sectarians...

(Really just illiterate and rigid psyche)

Better go to the factory...

You must have noticed by now that this forum is just crawling with egregious obscurantists ))).

 
Доктор:

The application of mathematical approaches to economics gave birth to econometrics. What science was born from the application of physical approaches toeconomics?

How many conferences on this science have you attended? Or at least familiarised yourself with the proceedings? Which Russian scientists involved in this science do you know?

Who in the world are the leading specialists in this science? How many books have you read on this subject? Or the Chukcha is not a reader, the Chukcha is a writer.

You are a dull ignoramus and boast of it. You don't read anything and so you think you're Columbus. I draw that conclusion from the nonsense and aplomb you've been peddling here.

I've been studyingeconophysics since the '90s, actually.

ZS At MEPhI, by the way, you made your mark too.)

эконофизику
эконофизику
  • yandex.ru
Найдётся всё
 
Valeriy Yastremskiy:

Econophysics since the 1990s, actually.

ZS At MEPhI, by the way, we got a mark too).

You shouldn't have suggested it. I wish the man had googled it himself. Otherwise he stopped catching mice.

 
Доктор:

You must have noticed by now that this forum is crawling with total obscurantists ))).

Yes... But ten years...

10 years of desperate cussing and cussing and all in vain around randomness...

There's an urgent need for an award of decay...

The answer was given on the first page...

I can't even believe it...

😲

 
transcendreamer:

Yes... but ten years...

Ten years of desperate cussing and cussing and all in vain around randomness...

There's an urgent need for an award of decay...

The answer was given on the first page...

I can't even believe it...

😲

Some of us must have been here since 2006 ... ... tinny ... But it's the funniest forum of all :)
But with Alexander's comment "at war as in war" I was lying under the table for 2 hours because I imagined the picture of a man sitting behind the computer in a military helmet and writing comments on the forum like a machine gun) where else you can get so much pleasure 😆
Who you won't meet here and witches who know some bread and butter, and graalenos broadcasting about the formula, and the excluded throwing thunderbolts at everyone around, and unrecognized geniuses, romantics, Buddhists, philosophers, etc..
 
CHINGIZ MUSTAFAEV:

You'll meet a lot of people here: sorcerers who know some bread and butter, and grailens who speak formulae, and outcasts who hurl thunderbolts at everyone around them, and unrecognised geniuses, romantics, Buddhists, philosophers, and so on.


And there are even "commanders of the Cuban Revolution".
 
Evgeniy Chumakov:


And even "Commander of the Cuban Revolution" is common.

Naturally))) Too bad you can't rename yourself to the good old CheGuevara name now =)

I'm part of this forum too, and I don't deny it by any means)