The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 329
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Then answer the question directly on the subject:
For two pages now, you've been skewering and can't answer a simple question.
You probably set your own goals (no, not probably, but you set specific goals) and also evasively answer yourself?
Do you not read my answers to your questions at all, or are you reading diagonally?
And that my answer was right behind your question, it didn't have time to get lost to become invisible to you:
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and strategy testing
The market is a controlled dynamic system.
Oleg avtomat, 2018.05.12 16:43
Your goal is to avoid a drain.
My goal -- maximizing cache.
They are not the same thing at all.
But you are mistaken in thinking that plum in my system is inevitable. No, it's not.
The goal is different: a 1000-fold increase of $10 in a very short time frame. Hence the increased risks. This is an experiment. I talked about it, but you didn't hear it.
If you don't set such a goal, then the risks are very low.
ss
Clarify exactly what you call a drain.
For example, with invested 10$ and withdrawn 1000$, will the loss of 100$ be considered a sinking?
A strange attractor is described by some mathematics, so in order to predict the behaviour of the tools you listed, you have to use this mathematics, express it in algorithms and appropriate codes. That is what I mean. What is wrong with that? What nonsense is there?
Thank you!
But I have no fantasies, purely practical interest.
And what have you calculated? Is the system capable or not, can you explain?
p.s. Can you calculate with reinvestment?Don't you get it? by analogy with the previous example:
12000 a year, i.e. 1000 a month --- you need a deposit of 60000
It is possible to calculate with reinvestment and not only --- but why, what is the point in it?
A strange attractor is described by some mathematics, so in order to predict the behaviour of the tools you listed, you have to use this mathematics, express it in algorithms and appropriate codes. That is what I mean. What is wrong with that? What nonsense is there?
http://procapital.ru/showthread.php?t=75633
For example, the Lorentz Attractor. The behaviour of an object is described by a system of three ordinary diffraction equations. And this is a strange attractor. We are not talking about some special mathematics designed to describe strange attractors. We are talking about the behavior of solutions, their dynamics, which does not fit into the standard set of descriptions, and therefore is called "strange" by someone's hand.
Recall: An attractor is an attracting set, i.e. a strange attractor is a strange (unusual) attracting set.
Don't you get it? By analogy with the previous example:
12000 per year, i.e. 1000 per month --- you need a deposit of 60000
It is possible to calculate with reinvestment and not only --- but why, what's the point?
I also want to understand the meaning of your experiments.
So, is your system capable of doing this or not?
I'm tired of asking, if you don't want to answer, keep playing.
I also want to understand the point of your experiments.
Is your system capable of this or not?
I'm tired of asking, if you don't want to answer, keep playing.
What's this??? What are you asking? Are you asking so much that you're tired of asking? Ask the question properly.
what kind of attractors are there? just tractors, just mashkas.
What tractors? Switched to rockets. The launch was successful, but went down. The second and subsequent launches will be similar. As the TC will not allow it to do so confidently.
What tractors? Switched to rockets. The launch was successful, but went down. The second and subsequent launches will be similar.As the TC will not allow it to do so confidently.
Life will show. Eh, prophets... By the way, any prophet prophesies strictly within his corridor of vision/understanding. And this corridor, as a rule, to put it mildly, is not too wide.
Life will show. Eh, prophets... By the way, any prophet prophesies strictly within his corridor of vision/understanding. And that corridor, as a rule, is not too wide, to put it mildly.
You have put your experiment on public display so to speak and discussed it, and now you are offended at everybody for the crookedness of your hands.
That doesn't seem very respectable.
Life will show. Eh, prophets... By the way, any prophet prophesies strictly within his corridor of vision/understanding. And this corridor, as a rule, to put it mildly, is not too wide.
Oleg, don't be nervous, look, I am not the only one who does not understand the meaning of your experiments.
Earlier I asked you, maybe it's better to make a systematic/periodic withdrawal, to "fix" the cache. But you got surprised, like "how to fix cache on demo!
Then I was even more surprised and asked "what's the point of having a sinking system if you don't withdraw cache and even on demo?
After that you were not surprised, but became angry and stopped wanting to support the discussion with me, but never mind, the strangeness is in something else.
Further it turns out, that this was the idea, and we need an explosive growth of securities (with small amounts of course, in your right mind even you would not bet a large sum on your system) with periodic withdrawals into cache. So, what the fuck... why the f*ck did you deny the need for cache output earlier?
The question is why didn't you just say so? There is nothing wrong with saying "yes, I'm using a lottery-type strategy, the odds are not great, but if I win, I win big". Even somewhere in the articles there is an example, something like a lottery/casino/coinette with a similar train of thought as yours, well there's nothing wrong with that, understand.
gzv. Besides, the comrades rightly point out the irrelevance of your fierce indignation at the perplexing remarks made about you, like, if you're engaged in trade-system exhibitionism, be kind and don't complain if random onlookers point the finger at you.