The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 327

 
Олег avtomat:
The sector in which the path to the goal should be located. You can go higher. You can't go lower.

.

In your system, I understand that the drain is inevitable. It's all a matter of when it happens.

Is it possible to avoid a drain in your system by reducing the targets?

[Deleted]  
Sergey Chalyshev:

In your system, I understand that the drain is inevitable. It's all a matter of when it happens.

In your system, is it possible to avoid draining by reducing the targets?

Your goal is to avoid a flush.

My goal is to maximize the cache.

They're not the same thing.

But you're mistaken in thinking that a flush in my system is inevitable. No, it's not.

The goal is different: a 1000-fold increase of $10 in a very short time frame. Hence the increased risks. This is an experiment. I talked about it, but you didn't hear it.

If you don't set such a goal, then the risks are very low.


ss

Clarify exactly what you call a drain.

For example, with 10$ invested and 1000$ withdrawn, would you consider a loss of 100$ as a plum?

 
Олег avtomat:

Your goal is to avoid being drained.

My goal is to maximise the cache.

They're not the same thing.

But you're deluded into thinking that flushing in my system is inevitable. No, it's not.

The goal is different: a 1000-fold increase of $10 in a very short time frame. Hence the increased risks. This is an experiment. I talked about it, but you didn't hear it.

If you don't set such a goal, then the risks are very low.


ss

Clarify exactly what you call a drain.

For example, with 10$ invested and 1000$ withdrawn, would you consider a loss of 100$ a drain?


The goal is the same for everyone, to maximise profitability (in your words probably cache).

I mean triggering of stopout, because it ruins the whole system, and is already out of this pit is unreal.

I haven't seen any real long term trading from you.

If the system allows, can you show a trade with a 10 - 20% drawdown, and a profit of 20% p.a.?

[Deleted]  
Sergey Chalyshev:


The goal is the same for all, to maximise profitability (in your words, the cache).

I mean a stop-out, because it ruins the whole system, and it is impossible to get out of this pit.

I don't see any real long term trading.

If the system allows, can you show me a trade with 10 - 20% drawdown and 20% annual profit?

I do not think this TS is profitable, and therefore it is unacceptable to me.

 
Олег avtomat:

I do not consider such a TS to be profitable, and therefore it is unacceptable to me.

So I understood correctly and wrote earlier that your system is periodically draining?

Sometimes you manage to get something out, but most of the time you deposit the account and go ahead, until the next time you lose.

[Deleted]  
Sergey Chalyshev:

So I understood correctly and wrote earlier that your system occasionally leaks?

Sometimes you manage to get something out, but most of the time you fund your account and go ahead until the next drain.

I don't care what you call correct understanding.

 
Олег avtomat:


Please tell me: "Do you really use algorithms describing strange attractors in your trading system?"

[Deleted]  

It is useful to understand what 20% per annum is, and what a deposit must be to live off this 20%.

Assuming $100,000 for a year, i.e. $100,000/12 = $8,333 for a month, a deposit of $500,000 (half a million) is needed to meet the annual needs


.

You can easily calculate on any given numbers.
 

Nice system.

It's better to cash out than to drain it all.

Norm

[Deleted]  
Aleksey Ivanov:

Please tell me: "Do you really use algorithms describing strange attractors in your trading system?"

Where is this quote from? Whose statement is that?

As a physicist, doesn't that question make you uncomfortable?