Catching a reversal or correction - page 13
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
How much and on what factors does the regulation of fractals depend?
I understand you want to adjust the configuration of fractal 2-2, 3-3, 4-4... or 2-3, 2-4, 2-5... or 3-2, 4-2, 5-2... and their combinations?
Under what circumstances should one look for various configurations of fractals that are not "common" and what conclusions should one draw when finding them?
My vision concerning the entries is as follows: first we look for a 1-2-3 pattern on, say, a weekly chart and then we find a pullback on a slower timeframe, wait for its termination and after breaking through the price consolidation level and if it happened approximately at the 23.6 Fibo level (Fibo opponents may laugh), we enter.
With the right input, the output is not so important.
With the right entry, the exit is not so important.
No! The exit is very important. It has to be done in the same context as the entrance.
You could, of course, shoot yourself - that's the way out too. But only a pathologist can appreciate the beauty of a shattered temporal bone...
The exit, in fact, is entirely mediated by the entrance. Otherwise, it's not a game, it's a wank...
If i look for the yellow-blue fractal, i will see 10/5 bars, if i see red-green 3/1 bar, i will see red breakdown upwards and vice versa , if i see yellow breakdown green breakdown downwards. What does the meeting think?
tara 06.02.2011 02:38 Bol Men has given me an adequate indication of fractals, for which he is very grateful :o)...
No! The exit is very important. It has to be done in the same context as the entrance.
You could, of course, shoot yourself - that's the way out too. But only a pathologist can appreciate the beauty of a crushed temporal bone...
Exit, in fact, is entirely mediated by entry. Otherwise, it's not a game, it's a wank...
1. If the input is good, the output is unimportant.
2. if it is important, see point 1.
1. If the entry is good, the exit is unimportant.
2. If it is important, see point 1.
Wanna bet? )))
Well there's no desire to prove the obvious... )))
Everything has its historical value. Everything passes. And to die in time, it's not to die, but to relax! )))
===
Man, I had a gazik package I bought for 200 back in some shaggy 2000s. So I sold it. I even played short, I remember...
"When you come in, don't be happy. When you leave, don't be sad."
Holy shit! There are no eternal values where you can walk in and be quietly moved by their possession!
If i look for the yellow-blue fractal, i will see 10/5 bars, if i see red-green 3/1 bar, i will see red breakdown upwards and vice versa , if i see yellow breakdown green breakdown downwards. What does the meeting think?
tara 06.02.2011 02:38 Bol Men has given me an adequate indictment of fractals, for which he is very grateful :o).
Paradoxically, in this case it is the output that is the problem.
Any mechanical algorithm for opening a position is equally probabilistic. Any advantage is offset by disadvantages. Triplets, structural triplets, reversal fours, FZR and variations, etc. (this is only by patterns). So with mechanical (understood only by TA) input, output will be the determining factor - here either experience or science.
Any mechanical algorithm for opening a position is equally probabilistic. Any advantage is offset by disadvantages. Triplets, structural triplets, reversal fours, FZR and variations, etc. (this is only by patterns). So with mechanical (understood only by TA) input, output will be the determining factor - either experience or science here.
Wait, I'm - outlining... Are you sure of your ignorance? Then - please continue...