LET'S SAY THAT ... - page 23
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I'll throw in my 5pts from my demo account as well.)))
The mind appears to me as "hardware" and the mind as "software". I.e. mind is the ability to think, and mind is the work of the mind.
But this is all so... on the level of feeling...))
You have to trust your senses )I'll throw in my 5pts from my demo account as well.)))
The mind appears to me as "hardware" and the mind as "software". I.e. mind is the ability to think, and mind is the work of the mind.
But this is all so... at the level of feelings...)))
And then came the internet. And computers started communicating not through floppy disks but through wires...... Who would have thought it possible back then.
Коль пошла такая пьянка, то и я кину свои 5 пп. с демо счета.)))
Ум мне представляется как "железо", а разум - как "софт". Т.е. ум - это способность мыслить, а разум - работа ума.
Но это все так... на уровне ощущений...)))
That's where we get all confused. We need to be more careful with definitions. I suggest another set.
Hardware == brain. Software == algorithms + data structures. Mind == "knowledge base". Mind == algorithms. Intelligence == the ability to bring the "knowledge base" in line with the input data (sensorics) with the help of thinking (algorithms).
Something like this.
Надо доверять своим ощущениям )
sort of. (+1)
Nah, well, you've got the concept of mind very twisted.
As I wrote: Mind = Mind* Cos(Angle of Direction of Use of Mind);
This begs the question: what is the angle itself. What is its definition.
Do you consider me intelligent? Or don't you? Why not?
So that's the market maker's answer!
You mean the price will go up in response to your buy? That would be the market maker's answer?
I'll probably voice my point of view later. It would be interesting to know the opinion of other forum visitors.
Не, ну вы сильно исказили понятие разума.
Sometimes you have to "twist" old concepts to bring them into line with reality.
As I've written before: Mind = Mind* Cos(Angle of Direction of Use of Mind);
Your formula is cool, but flawed. It leads to the fixation of the "mind trap" - the inability to go beyond the "knowledge base".
This begs the question: what is the angle itself. What is it defined by.
Do you consider me intelligent? Or don't you? Why not?
Do you want an honest answer, or do you want to like it?
;)
I cannot say anything for sure about Forex, but I think the mechanism there is similar. I am taking the interbank level at least, of course. There is no point in discussing brokerage companies.
Иногда нужно "искажать" старые понятия, дабы привести в соответствие с реальностью.
Why don't we... let's just distort reality, shall we? A hundred grams to warm it up, huh? Not enough? Two hundred, then.
Your formula is cool, but flawed. It leads to a fixation on the "mind trap" - the inability to go beyond the "knowledge base".
Well, in a sense (Gödel again) it does.
That's tough and win-win! ))) As an argument...
Do you want an honest answer, or do you want to like it?
;)
"How about a kiss?" )))