Avalanche - page 155

 
JonKatana писал(а) >>
It was compared to casinos and red/black betting (this could also include even/odd, etc.). Forex is very simple and is exactly the same two-way system. Just like in the casino, you need to guess whether the price will go up or down. That is all! If you guessed right, you win, if you didn't guess wrong, you lose. Only in the casino you lose 1 bet, or you win 1 bet. While in Forex - you lose 1 bet, but you can win 10, 20, 100 bets! You still invest an amount equal to 1 bet. Both casino and Forex have the same chances of guessing - the odds are always 50/50. But the profits differ considerably.


Yes.... how messed up everything is....
You should at least write a two line EA that opens trades randomly / not randomly with SL = X, TP = k*X and run it on history...
If price was always going in one direction - you'd be right, but price doesn't stand still, so you're very much mistaken
 
lexandros, I second the motion.
2 Galina:
And what are you hanging around here then if "The whole topic is FLOOD" ??? <br / translate="no">.
Well, you see, Galina, the attitude to the topic changes, evolves. At first, several people including me tried to persuade the afftar with logical and ordinary human arguments that he was wrong, to put it mildly. The afftar stood his ground and even won a few supporters - despite the fact that he did not provide a single shred of evidence of the correctness of his... er... hypotheses. Yes, yes, not a single statment, not a single indictment.

He automatically attributed what his supporters did to him (even though the systems created "based on" were different from his own). No problem: all you have to do is refer to the supporters and say that it's still an avalanche, too.

At the same time, the author regularly, in a mentor-like tone, instructs everyone and hands out the standard advice such as "think before you write". Later, it turned out that the author did not understand the basic notions of trading: he compared equity to collateral while the notion of equity itself was considered completely irrelevant to trading. Earlier, he had said that he could manage accounts worth tens of millions. He referred to reasonable egoism and spoke about great pleasure he gives to people - and so on and so forth. There was also a pearl about the difference between a four and a five, which also amused me. I told a far cry from all the diamonds he gave out.

This made me laugh and changed my attitude to him, because I realized that logic does not work here. He continues to spew his quips with enviable regularity, which makes me happy.

Now I think that in no way a branch should be demolished, because it is a true decoration of such a boring forum lately. And I come here regularly, to lift my spirits - to have a few laughs.

If you see something interesting and useful here, go ahead and develop it. Everything interesting and useful has been done in spite of the topic, not because of it.
 
Mathemat >>:


Теперь считаю, что ветку ни в коем случае сносить нельзя, т.к. она является истинным украшением такого скучного в последнее время форума. А захожу сюда регулярно, для поднятия настроения - чтобы немного поржать.

Если Вы что-то тут видите интересное и пользительное - ради бога, пользуйтесь и развивайте. Все интересное и нужное было сделано вопреки теме, а не благодаря ей.

+10

 
kch >>:


Интересно. Выкладывайте советник.
А вообще если вам не очень сложно, опишите суть стратегии на текущем этапе, я думаю она существенно отличается от первоначального варианта, предложенного JonKatana.

I am posting the advisor we are working on together with Galina. Watch it, criticise it, suggest improvements.

Briefly about the Expert Advisor:

1. it opens one position from the market (if the previous candle is white, it is a sell, the opposite is a buy) and one more pending order with a double lot - of the opposite direction at a distance of Step points. The first order with Take Profit in pips (TP is moved to external parameters).

2. If the first order closed at Take profit, everything is done again.

If the price moves in another direction and a pending order is placed at another level (at which the order is placed from the market), another pending order is placed with the double lot. And so on.

4. Everything is closed by a virtual Take Profit (in parameters it is set in the currency of deposit - be careful, commensurate it with the initial lot).

5. Also attached is a virtual trailing stop for all piles of orders by Kim. I have not understood how it works and if it works at all. If someone explains it to me, I would be very grateful.

Files:
lavigne_3.rar  19 kb
 
lexandros >>:


Так весело же:) Я сюда захожу вечером, как раз для поднятия настроения... Топикстартер обычно тоже по вечерам появляется... и почти всегда очередную корку мочит... Ложусь спать веселый и счастливый:)

Yes? I, on the other hand, have started to lose faith in humanity and robotics as well.

Maybe the subjmaker is neither of those things after all? Although the thought of encountering alien forex, intelligence and logic also scares me...

 
rumata1984 >>:

Выкладываю советник, на которым мы работаем вместе с Галиной. Смотрите, критикуйте, предлагайте улучшения.

Кратко о советнике:

1. Открывает одну позицию с рынка (если предыдущая свеча белая - то продажа, наоборот - покупка) и еще один отложенный ордер с удвоенным лотом - противоположного направления на расстоянии Step пунктов. Первый ордер с тейк-профитом в пунктах (тп вынесен во внешние параметры).

2. Если первый ордер закрылся по тейку, все снова.

3. Если цена идет в другую сторону и цепляет отложенный ордер на другом уровне (на котором висит ордер с рынка) открывается еще один отложенный ордер опять же с удвоенным лотом. И так далее.

4. Все закрывается по виртуальному тейк-профиту (в параметрах он устанавливается в валюте депозита - будьте внимательны, соизмеряйте его с начальным лотом).

5. Прикручен также виртуальный трейлинг стоп для всей кучи ордеров от Кима. Вот как он работает и работает ли вообще, я еще пока сам не разобрался. Если кто мне объяснит, буду очень благодарен.




Lazy to mess around with other people's code. When you post EAs, attach the state and set with used parameters... It's more visual... The sense is to send the same signal to everyone just to be sure that everyone is losing. But if you post the profitable straight, say for the year 2008, with its unpredictable and wild flops and jumps - then it will be possible to watch... My dear Khorosh - he puts out only shares... But I have serious doubts that there is even 10% of an avalanche there... But when there will be a code - which really contains an avalanche in a pure form and a profitable state - it will be really interesting...

By the way - if bugs will start in tester - it will be easier for you as author to catch them at once... Than to wait for others to run it - and tell you about the bugs found...
 
Svinozavr >>:

Да? А я вот напротив - начал терять веру в человечество, а заодно и в робототехнику.

Может, сабжмейкер все же ни то и ни др.? Хотя мысли о встрече с инопланетным форексом, разумом и логикой меня также пугают...


hehe... maybe in the scheduler it should be - to enter bot later than 19.00 MSK and leave at 22.00 MSK... We should analyze the timing of its appearances :))) Really looks like a bot... Normal people visit the forum spontaneously... when they feel like it... or when there's a lull at work... Or just for fun... And the blogger is very predictable... at certain hours... that makes me think... ))))
 


It's impossible for a man not to know the basics.
We rule out the bot.
that leaves us with the mozochism.
 
JonKatana писал(а) >>
It is compared to casinos and red/black betting (even/odd, etc.). Forex is very simple and is exactly the same two-way system. Just like in the casino, you need to guess whether the price will go up or down. That is all! If you guessed right, you win, if you didn't guess wrong, you lose. Only in the casino you lose 1 bet, or you win 1 bet. While in Forex - you lose 1 bet, but you can win 10, 20, 100 bets! You still invest an amount equal to 1 bet. Both casino and Forex have the same chances of guessing - the odds are always 50/50. But the profits differ considerably.


If you're comparing it with a casino... I say, why write about the casino if you haven't been there? The casino is easier and clearer than Forex. On the forex, you need 106 pips to double! You lose at the casino because you're drunk... Or nervous.... (especially at poker - you can play cards and look and the chance is higher!) The rule is simple - don't play one-on-one even at roulette - it's a fact. There are people who are not allowed into the casinos - beat them! (So say black list). Good luck!
 
"Well, we have, in short, an assassin coming from behind a tank in a Gold helmet entirely."
That's me overhearing my son playing and commenting.
Reason: