EURUSD - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Part 1) - page 1100 1...109310941095109610971098109911001101110211031104110511061107...2305 New comment AlexAN 2010.02.24 14:59 #10991 rustein писал(а) >> forte928 You said yesterday that we go up, I opened a short, today you tell me to go down, I open a long. Is this correct? . Well, if you don't trust Forte, that's right. The man says up - short. He says down - long... We'll end up draining if he's right... You're not confused about the terminology there? AlexAN 2010.02.24 15:08 #10992 forte928 писал(а) >> We will not break through the convergent triangle, we will be going down till March 8, only on the 5th-6th we might break up. Forte, what converging triangle are you talking about? I only see a divergent... Can I see your triangle? Александр Шевчук 2010.02.24 15:13 #10993 He's talking about this one Galina 2010.02.24 15:16 #10994 unclear.... and where do you find it all :)) It just looks like a 1.35 level to me And it doesn't look weak !!!! I wouldn't rush to shorts if I were you ..... It may go up considerably, and then it will go down (unless we hit 1.47!) EURUSD - Trends, Forecasts custom indicator fractals signal [Archive] FOREX - Trends, Galina 2010.02.24 15:19 #10995 In general, a WONDERFUL PLACE FOR LONGS !!! Александр Шевчук 2010.02.24 15:19 #10996 Galina >>: Непонятно.... и где вы все это находите :)) По мне так там просто уровень 1,35 И похоже не слабый !!!! Я бы с шортами не торопилась на вашем месте ..... Выкинуть может наверх сильно, а потом только вниз (если конечно на 1,47 не пойдем !!! ) Short is not me.)) Galina 2010.02.24 15:23 #10997 strangerr писал(а) >> >> Short's not me. >>)) AHH... I remember :))) I'm at work, robotics are at home :)) I don't know what they're gonna rustle up for me :)) Александр Шевчук 2010.02.24 15:27 #10998 Galina >>: ААА... Ну да вспомнила :))) А я на работе ща, роботеки дома колбасят :)) Не знаю, че там они мне нашуршат :)) I'm sitting in a 5% slump, but it's about to start breaking even. Warstein 2010.02.24 15:28 #10999 Galina >>: ААА... Ну да вспомнила :))) А я на работе ща, роботеки дома колбасят :)) Не знаю, че там они мне нашуршат :)) Excuse me for asking, why do you trade intramillenium? Do robots work like that too? Galina 2010.02.24 15:30 #11000 rustein писал(а) >> Excuse me for asking, why do you trade intramillenium? Do robots work that way too? I didn't understand the point of the question .... 1...109310941095109610971098109911001101110211031104110511061107...2305 New comment
forte928 You said yesterday that we go up, I opened a short, today you tell me to go down, I open a long. Is this correct?
The man says up - short. He says down - long... We'll end up draining if he's right...
You're not confused about the terminology there?
We will not break through the convergent triangle, we will be going down till March 8, only on the 5th-6th we might break up.
Forte, what converging triangle are you talking about? I only see a divergent...
Can I see your triangle?
He's talking about this one
unclear.... and where do you find it all :))
It just looks like a 1.35 level to me
And it doesn't look weak !!!!
I wouldn't rush to shorts if I were you .....
It may go up considerably, and then it will go down (unless we hit 1.47!)
Непонятно.... и где вы все это находите :))
По мне так там просто уровень 1,35
И похоже не слабый !!!!
Я бы с шортами не торопилась на вашем месте .....
Выкинуть может наверх сильно, а потом только вниз (если конечно на 1,47 не пойдем !!! )
Short is not me.))>> Short's not me. >>))
AHH...
I remember :)))
I'm at work, robotics are at home :))
I don't know what they're gonna rustle up for me :))
ААА...
Ну да вспомнила :)))
А я на работе ща, роботеки дома колбасят :))
Не знаю, че там они мне нашуршат :))
I'm sitting in a 5% slump, but it's about to start breaking even.ААА...
Ну да вспомнила :)))
А я на работе ща, роботеки дома колбасят :))
Не знаю, че там они мне нашуршат :))
Excuse me for asking, why do you trade intramillenium? Do robots work like that too?
Excuse me for asking, why do you trade intramillenium? Do robots work that way too?
I didn't understand the point of the question ....