Well, in theory, he's right. 3rd is short and 1st is not stretched either. Technically, of course, a stretched 5th is possible. But then target = parity. It's scary to think about. But! It is also not a Zigzag, for the reason that wave B is smaller in time than A and C. This is a sacred rule :) (Also the 2nd wave may NOT be shorter in time than 1 and 3 ).
I.e. according to the wave analysis the uncertainty comes out. I would mark wave "B" with wave "X" or a supposed triangle, some of the Neowave. But in terms of prediction, as of now, it gives nothing. :(
Oh, at least someone has a knack for nitpicking... It looks like a double zigzag or a double combination (say, zigzag + triangle). It really doesn't look like a pulse.
О, хоть кто-то шарит в ниливодстве... Похоже там двойной зигзаг формируется либо двойная комбинация (скажем зигзаг + треуг). На импульс и вправду не похоже.
Don't swear in foul language, just write the numbers)))
Oh, at least someone has a knack for nitpicking... It looks like a double zigzag or a double combination (say, zigzag + triangle). It really doesn't look like a pulse.
Yes, probably it will be. The main thing after such pattern, as it is a corrective one, is expected to correct at least 61.8%.
Strangerr, if you need figures, the correction from the reversal point should be 61.8% (this is the minimum target). At the moment it is 1.36. Another question is where this pivot point is. :)
Всем привет, объяснили чуваку как Элвейв настроить?
Hello, what are your ideas for the euro/dollar today?
Я на остановке 1.3420 стою . не забудте меня забрать перед отъездом на юга, пожалуйста....
It's time to get off at that stop.Здравствуйте, какие у вас на сегодня идеи по евро\долл?
And what are the ideas here, I see while I was away you have already tweaked upwards and are turning downwards again)))Well, in theory, he's right. 3rd is short and 1st is not stretched either. Technically, of course, a stretched 5th is possible. But then target = parity. It's scary to think about.
But! It is also not a Zigzag, for the reason that wave B is smaller in time than A and C. This is a sacred rule :) (Also the 2nd wave may NOT be shorter in time than 1 and 3 ).
I.e. according to the wave analysis the uncertainty comes out. I would mark wave "B" with wave "X" or a supposed triangle, some of the Neowave. But in terms of prediction, as of now, it gives nothing. :(
Oh, at least someone has a knack for nitpicking... It looks like a double zigzag or a double combination (say, zigzag + triangle). It really doesn't look like a pulse.Slightly down 70-80 ppts then target 1.35(first)
О, хоть кто-то шарит в ниливодстве... Похоже там двойной зигзаг формируется либо двойная комбинация (скажем зигзаг + треуг). На импульс и вправду не похоже.
Don't swear in foul language, just write the numbers)))Выше 1.3395 - это уже выход на коррекцию с отменой медвежьего сценария. Медведям такое допускать никак низя.
At m15 the 5th wave starts (down), my maximum target is 1.3270, and then we'll see.
Oh, at least someone has a knack for nitpicking... It looks like a double zigzag or a double combination (say, zigzag + triangle). It really doesn't look like a pulse.Yes, probably it will be. The main thing after such pattern, as it is a corrective one, is expected to correct at least 61.8%.
Strangerr, if you need figures, the correction from the reversal point should be 61.8% (this is the minimum target). At the moment it is 1.36.
Another question is where this pivot point is. :)