MetaTrader does not reflect reality ! How can I fight this ? - page 23
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I can't change your mind. You don't want to look at your drawdown, don't look at it. And torture yourself for the rest of your life with the question of whether your trading system will work in the future or not...
Strange thing..... In fact I am looking at my drawdown and carefully calculating my MM. But I asked you about drawdown and you couldn't even answer the question except to say that you do not tolerate more than 40 points per trade, as it turned out later. But that's not an indicator, as losing trades can be from 0 to 100%. Well if you suffer a long time, you'll get something.....)))))
The point is that for any system there is an anti-system, even if it does not break down, it will not bring more interest on the bank account if it eats up liquidity in the market.
When large volumes hit it, the market will adapt to it and swallow it... the advantage will wither away... we will have to find a new one or grind out the old one.
Of course, I'm not going to prove why it's erased here... just believe that it will...
It is possible to describe the ideal TS - it is not a problem. The problem is to put it into practice......And aspiration is a good thing, but it is necessary to be realistic all the same and to understand that one cannot jump higher than a certain bar.....))))
Strange thing..... I'm looking at my drawdown and am very "hard" to calculate my MM, but I asked you about drawdown and you couldn't even answer the question except to say that you do not allow more than 40 pips loss per trade. But this is not an indicator, because losing trades can be from 0 to 100%. Well, if you suffer for a long time, you will get something.....)))))
In my opinion, if you remember it was not a single point. (It is an indication that the cp is not a loser).
40 is the maximum that can be allowed (and that is too much). my opinion, in case you haven't forgotten, there was not a single point at all. (an indication that the TS is not losing).
It turns out?
Yes it will be a pipsqueak. In spite of the name, all troubles related to pipsing for a broker (or for a trader) are connected with the small time of position holding. And this is the defining value of this concept; short targets is only one of ways to be in the market less. At least in a profitable position. imha.
Pips are bad if they are profitable. And it's good if it's a loser. This is the logic of ALL DTs, which do not withdraw anything, no matter how much capital they have or how long they are in the market. It is a casino with its own rules: you can win, but not much.
Pipsing is the usual way of working. Holding a position for a second - why not? If there were such prices with volumes, no problem.
You can take the same nonsense about scalping that the traders accept with hooray, as they do. But in fact there is nothing bad in it. Take ticks with volumes and see if you can or cannot perform pipsing there. The tester, of course, will not account for some volume correction. But it will still be able to give a relatively-coarse assessment of prospectivity.
While you are in DC, they will tell you a lot of stories why they do not allow you to work. In fact, apart from the pipsipsing they will talk about the bad arbitrage and other allegedly cheating technologies.
If we deal with so-called retail "interbank" we will have less problems, but the volumes will be higher.
Being on the institutional "interbank", there will be even fewer problems, but they will start.
Any super-profitable system causes problems on any platform, if only because there is a human factor on the broker's part.
All this is from personal experience. My point is, don't be afraid of pips and similar systems. They are all ABSOLUTELY market driven, not cheating.
FapTurbo and company can be a good system on some DCs for a while. Run the same system on interbank with volumes and you will see a relatively good result.
The market may be considered as the only way to calculate the initial exchange rate. There is only one pie on the interbank, but there are a lot of mouths. They just won't let them.
40 is the maximum that can be allowed (and that is too much). my opinion, in case you haven't forgotten, there was not a single point at all. (an indication that the CU is not losing).
Who is going to pay for such risk-free earnings? If someone earns so confidently, then the moment of a trade, there are always imbeciles who just as confidently lose. How do you want to calculate them?)
Is it working?
Look at the picture 'MetaTrader does not reflect reality ! how to deal with it ?' carefully, this is the operation of an automaton on a demo account. the trades are carried on the screen.
Very often it does, except in case of powerful jumps (see fig. there). It's precisely at such moments ticks are very important and necessary. Waiting for the bar to end is not an option ((
Pips are bad if they are profitable. And it's good if it's a loser. This is the logic of ALL DTs, which do not withdraw anything, no matter how much capital they have or how long they are in the market. It is a casino with its own rules: you can win, but not much.
Pipsing is the usual way of working. Holding a position for a second - why not? If there were such prices with volumes, no problem.
You can take the same nonsense about scalping that the traders accept with hooray, as they do. But in fact there is nothing bad in it. Take ticks with volumes and see if you can or cannot perform pipsing there. The tester, of course, will not account for some volume correction. But it will still be able to give a relatively-coarse assessment of perspective.
While you are in DC, they will tell you a lot of stories why they do not let you work. In fact, apart from the pipsipsing they will talk about the bad arbitrage and other allegedly cheating technologies.
If we deal with so-called retail "interbank" we will have less problems, but the volumes will be higher.
Being on the institutional "interbank", there will be even fewer problems, but they will start.
Any super-profitable system causes problems on any platform, if only because there is a human factor on the broker's side.
All this is from personal experience. My point is, don't be afraid of pips and similar systems. They are all ABSOLUTELY market driven, not cheating.
FapTurbo and company can be a good system on some DCs for a while. Run the same system on the interbank with volumes and you will see a relatively good result.
And then try this system on the interbank and you will see the failure, because only lazy toastmasters have not implemented this simple scheme, and there is enough of such toastmasters. There is only one pie on the interbank, but there are a lot of mouths. They just will not let them do it.
As for the pipsipsips, I'm not afraid, I've been trading for 8 years myself and I know where and how one can get them and where the haemorrhoids are))).
Do you know what drawdown=0 is? Suppose we have a deposit of $1000. The margin for 1 lot = $1000. So we can open with at least 1 lot. A profit of 40 pips will be equal to 40% of the deposit. And in a month.....fantastic! the golden key is in our pocket!