Indicators: Karpenko_HTF
Hello, Nikolay Kositsin! I am very grateful to you for this translation of my Karpenko indicator from MQL4 to MQL5, even in the form of a cloud - it's just great! Since the truth is the main judge for you and me (I dare to think), I would like to mention one inaccuracy. My indicator is predictive, and its upper line is always above the price, and the lower line is always below - these lines indicate the targets, where the price will come in the near future, and in your edition, time segments appear on the chart, where the price is not in the cloud. Please eliminate this inaccuracy (at least, as I did with your code, making the cloud one-colour) Sincerely, Dmitry Karpenko. P.S. I am repeating my comment to your publication of 28.04.14 in the hope that some of the two letters will get to you :-). Thanks again.
Good day! I just found this variation of your indicator more interesting, but if you are not satisfied with it, you can make a comment and add your own code variant or even just place your code in the codebase using my code as a template. It's three minutes of work.
So, you were authorised to rewrite codes, modify them as it seems more "interesting", and at the same time omit the real author????
You should at least learn to think and formulate your thoughts normally, and then get involved in debates that don't concern you personally!
Oh, by the way, here is the author:
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+ //|Karpenko.mq4 | //| Copyright 2014, MetaQuotes Software Corp. | | //| http://www.mql5.com | //+------------------------------------------------------------------+ #property copyright "Copyright 2014, MetaQuotes Software Corp." #property link "http://www.mql5.com"
At least learn to think and formulate your thoughts properly, and then get involved in debates that do not concern you personally!
Oh, by the way, here's the author:
debates that don't concern me? nigga! and maybe you'll rewrite my work and finish it "as better and more interesting", who knows you, megapisitsa... and the file name doesn't say anything about authorship, this line clearly says it:
#property copyright "Copyright 2014, MetaQuotes Software Corp."
Understand, everyone understands that you do a tedious but necessary and important work. But you are not entitled to a monument, as the work is paid and accordingly do not need to make a great martyr of yourself. Respect the authors and be kind to indicate their real names.
you will rewrite my work and finish it "as better and more interesting", who knows you, megapwriter... and the name of the file does not say anything about authorship, this line clearly says so:
Understand, everyone understands that you do a tedious but necessary and important work. But you are not entitled to a monument, as the work is paid and accordingly do not need to make a great martyr of yourself. Respect the authors and be kind enough to specify their real names.
I repeat once again: "You should at least learn to think and formulate your thoughts normally, and then get involved in debates that do not concern you personally!". This is actually a programmers' site, not a site of gossiping women! I redesign mountains of the most critical code with a huge number of errors, and it's my right to redesign this code as I please, I have no restrictions and conditions! You put the code in free access? That's it! It doesn't belong to you anymore! And you can exercise your bird rights anywhere but here! No one owes you anything personally.
But the only thing that I always do pedantically accurately is to copywrite the author of the code as he was in the source:
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+ //|Karpenko.mq4 | //| Copyright 2014, MetaQuotes Software Corp. | | //| http://www.mql5.com | //+------------------------------------------------------------------+ #property copyright "Copyright 2014, MetaQuotes Software Corp." #property link "http://www.mql5.com"
I'm not in the business of reading between the lines of software code! And if it was the author's will to specify the author in this way, it was entirely his will!
I repeat once again: "You should at least learn to think and formulate your thoughts properly, and then get involved in debates that do not concern you personally!". This is a site of programmers, not gossiping women! I redesign mountains of the most critical code with a huge number of errors, and it's my right to redesign this code as I please, I have no restrictions and conditions! You put the code in free access? That's it! It doesn't belong to you anymore! And you can exercise your bird rights anywhere but here! No one owes you anything personally.
But the only thing that I always do pedantically accurately is to copywrite the author of the code as he was in the source:
I'm not in the business of reading between the lines of software code! And if it was the author's will to specify the author in this way, it was entirely his will!
Good. Then make specific remarks as you were rightly told, like "The author's source code was wretched and I have rewritten it according to my personal judgement of the beauty and functionality of the programmes, with correction of errors". So that it would be clear to everyone that this is no longer what the author intended.
And nobody has ever presented me such conditions when converting the codebase, except for three ardent dogmatists. Everyone is satisfied with everything! Everyone is happy!
Ahhh, well, okay then...
zy amba...
what this one does?
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
Karpenko_HTF:
The Karpenko indicator with the timeframe selection option available in input parameters.
Author: Nikolay Kositsin