a trading strategy based on Elliott Wave Theory - page 242
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Yeah, I wonder if the algorithms are that different. Or ticks... threw in a request to yurixxx AT gmail DOT com. Wonder where my previous email went - no return.
It didn't come back because there's a user with that nickname. That's why I had to add another x. And as for the algorithms, I had another idea to check the zigzag tops. It's quite possible that that's where the divergence starts. After all, after all, Pastukhov's calculation scheme is so elementary that even a schoolboy could implement it.
I haven't received the letter yet. If you want, you can just give your e-mail address, without all that fuss.
By the way, will he by any chance send a letter to 6m?
I propose to begin by checking the constructions for random ticks ( http://www.filefactory.com/file/050ece/ ) for arbitrariness. I have got it so:
It's not great, but it's what it is. If your spread is less, I will revise my strategy.
By the way, he won't by any chance send a letter 6m away?
No problem: Laundrywasher at yandex dot ru and 6m should not be rejected.
I don't mind though, a bit later. I did a zigzagrenko yesterday, but it still has a lot to fix.
As soon as I finish it I will count both kagi and renko at the same time. But I will download the posted files.
I, by the way, downloaded the 2005 ticks from the site mentioned above, and was horrified by the jumble of dates in the files. Maybe it's only that year. How were things in 2006?
only makes sense as a programming exercise.
And in my opinion it would be not quite a trivial generalization of Pastukhov's results, such a zigzag is a combination of Lebrg and Riemann splitting at the same time.
Yeah, there was one problem there too. The files seemed to be month by month, but some included 3 or 2 months each. So I had to cut out all the extra stuff.
And in the end I had to write a handler for these files in MQL4, since neither Excel nor MT4 built-in tools could handle it. One does not like commas, the other - format, Excel does not accept more than 65000. All in all, what a piece of software. :-)
That's why I've left only what I really need - date, time, tick. (earlier I wrote wrongly that there is only one column in this file).
I don't know what you're talking about. A zigzag can be built on any sequence of numbers. However, building by Open or Close makes no physical sense whatsoever. That's exactly what I meant in the quote above.
I don't know what you're talking about. A zigzag can be built on any sequence of numbers. However, building by Open or Close makes no physical sense whatsoever. That's exactly what I meant in the quote above.
I don't know about the physical sense, but in terms of approximating a price series.
Well, when Pastukhov calculates volatility by value breakdown (i.e. by price = Leberg breakdown), then he compares it with volatility obtained by time breakdown (Riemannian breakdown) and shows that they are equal. Therefore the combination of these two splits i.e. by values in H range and by time (we take only values on the timeframe boundaries, i.e. open and close) is in theory quite reasonable and may have some advantages, because close behaves more quietly than high and low.