a trading strategy based on Elliott Wave Theory - page 111
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Here is Rosh's picture, the quotes are almost the same
And here's mine, at first everything seems fine too, then quotes start lagging and then overtake, maybe a glitch in graphics editor?
Your quotes are normally superimposed on Vladislav's quotes, but mine do not want to (the same pattern but the time scale is different in different parts), it seems my broker is cheating :), or maybe it's because of the strange period of 31, but I do not know how to quickly get data up to a certain date, I receive using the script StepByStep
I posted using MQ data (I understand it suits you better). I "killed" the data before a certain date simply - manually through the quotes archive. Select the bar and "Delete". I forgot about the StepByStep script, I just haven't tried it myself.
Tell me more - how is it visible? Who has a conditional, and who has normal. I did not immediately see (and not immediately after
I also could not understand it.)
It's just that they are available to everyone.
OK. After all +/- 1 is nothing compared to the revolution (in autotrading Forex). :-)
By the way, I'm not the author of this formula. It predates me, in the 18th century.
I use a normal distribution, and Vladislav I understand the Student distribution. Where my picture is superimposed the biggest channel is almost the same not only by the centre line but also by the confidence intervals, while the shorter channels are different, though maybe it seems to me, because the centre lines don't coincide either :(
What is interesting, I also thought so before, and you try to replace N with N+1 or N-1, I can't find any channels from this replacement. So, although 1 is a small number but the contribution is significant (to the revolution) :)
Actually, it shouldn't be. A revolution must be stable with respect to slight changes in the number of revolutionaries. Does this happen on all channels or only on short channels?
And in that conclusion I sent you, N is the number of bars on which the calculation is done.
I neglected from the beginning the difference between the number of degrees of freedom and this N.
In any case, even if there is now an error, the figures I posted show that it can be avoided.
I mean the number of degrees of freedom and the number of bars and number of measurements is the same, but the number of bars counts from 0, that's the difference.