There are ideas for a profitable advisor - page 10

 
gvs:

Here's this week's report, please))))))Silent your ride, farther away you will be.

from where you're going :-)))
 
Do you close a losing series? On what principle?
 
223231:
Do you close a losing series? What's the principle?
As you can see, my last 3 large trades are in the +, and the small ones are nothing in relation to the profitable ones.
 
223231:
Do you close losing series? On what principle?

the principle here is simple -- Ilan -- on a pullback, the limits were set in 10 pips increments:

according to the report -- the first order was bought at 101.51 -- 0.01 lots -- then the price rolled back and in 10 pips incremental limiters were triggered using the Martin rule.

the average price of the allocated orders -- 101.24 -- the whole chain was closed with a total profit of 10 pips at 101.34.

gvs:
as you can see my last 3 big trades are in the +, and the small ones in relation to the profitable ones are petty.

it was because of martin the last orders were closed in a big way, overlapping unprofitable small orders.

the simple way everyone knows - Ilan - profitable until the first pullback - which will inevitably happen and gobble up all the "joy".

 
abolk:

The principle here is simple -- Ilan -- on a pullback, limiters are placed in 10 pips:

according to the report -- the first order was bought at 101.51 -- 0.01 lots -- then the price rolled back and in 10 pips incremental limiters were triggered using the Martin rule.

the average price of the allocated orders -- 101.24 -- the whole chain was closed with a total profit of 10 pips at 101.34.

it was because of martin the last orders were closed in a big way, overlapping unprofitable small orders.

the simple way everyone knows - Ilan - profitable until the first strong pullback - which will inevitably happen and will eat up all the "joy".

Yes)))) here I could argue and prove, but I have no desire.Everything is so simple and easy, only one but))))))) the right entry point, that's the secret))))))))))
 
gvs:
Yes)))) here I could argue and prove, but I have no desire.Everything is so simple and easy, only one but))))))) the right entry point, that's the secret))))))))))

-well, we got the Ilan strategy sorted out and even got confirmation from the author

-- But if you want to solve this problem with "right" entry point - let's do this - you post weekly reports - and all together we'll see the end of your "secret" - two weeks (as I understand) are successful so far, jam, let's go on

p.s. By the way, the Expert Advisor, which by Ilan's strategy accompanies manually open orders - I can do it (for money, contact me)

 
abolk:

-well, we got the Ilan strategy sorted out and even got confirmation from the author

-- But if you want to solve this problem with "right" entry point - let's do this - you post weekly reports - and all together we'll see the end of your "secret" - two weeks (as I understand) are successful so far, jam, let's go on

p.s. By the way, the Expert Advisor, which by Ilan's strategy accompanies manually open orders - I can do it (for money, contact me)

I don't get it, the first order is manual and the next ones are automatic?
 
gvs:
I do not understand: the first order is opened manually and the next ones are opened automatically?

It's not all about writing a full automaton - you can also partially automate the process.

if the "secret" is the right entry point -- and the first order is known.

then you can -- a) manually open the first order according to your needs -- b) use the known algorithm to follow this opening

 
If there is no fixing of the losing series, the bottom line is that it will be a drain. It is a matter of time. If the entry point is right, averaging is unnecessary; if it is right, averaging does not give a stat advantage.
 
223231:
If there is no fixing of the losing streaks, the bottom line is going to be the sinking. It is a matter of time. If your entry point is right, you don't need averaging, if your entry point is wrong, averaging does not give you a stat advantage.

You are in too much of a hurry, I sometimes don't understand what you are writing.

My understanding is: We'll see.

Reason: