Why don't I read the articles? - page 10

 
Reshetov:

For traders, any trading platform will do, where the interface contains everything you need to send an order to the broker manually + output of technical indicators on the chart for decision making + news feed. For autotrading any platform will not work. That's why emphasis is placed on autotrading and autotrading championships as well.

I.e. want or not the readers, but this resource is more suitable for those who think before doing something, rather than for fans of warez with "free" cheese for zarobotka online.

You know, I'm like many IT specialist, except that I'm an admin, not a programmer.

So all business problems revolve around one simple thing, the IT specialist is the service personnel (except for integrators and software companies) and especially in the financial sector. If you don't know how to make money in the market, all your knowledge of programming is useless, like a scuba tank in an aeroplane. A talented artist can solve a problem without Photoshop, albeit not as effectively/effectively...

Getting back to the topic, the administration needs to develop the direction of not How to program, but What to program, and Why in this platform, what are its advantages compared to others?

 
St.Vitaliy:

Going back to the topic, the administration needs to develop the focus not on how to program, but on what to program.

Do you know WHAT to program?
 
St.Vitaliy:

You know, I am like many IT professionals in the world, except that I am an administrator and not a programmer.

So all business problems revolve around one simple thing, an IT specialist is a service staff (except for integrators and software companies) and this especially applies to the financial sector. If you don't know how to make money in the market, all your knowledge of programming is useless, like a scuba tank in an aeroplane. A talented artist can solve a problem without Photoshop, albeit not as effectively/effectively...

Returning to the topic, the administration needs to develop the direction not How to program, but What to program, and Why in this platform, what are its advantages compared to others?

I have here comes to mind such an association, for example, a man came to the butcher shop and laments that he can not buy a loaf. They say, - The bread shop is in another place -, - Well, why is not a loaf here, it's also a shop, works on the same principle as the other shops, it would be convenient if here and were loaves, it should develop the bread department.
 

St.Vitaliy:

Going back to the topic, the administration should develop the direction not How to program, but What to program.

It's good that the administration is more adequate than some of the advisers and chose OOP over the algorithmic programming language. It used to be well known that we could program only: Expert Advisors, scripts and technical indicators. A step to the right or to the left - dll. Now there is an OOP and freedom in the question: what to program. But along with the freedom of choice there are questions on the question: How to program? For the functionality has increased and is expanding all the time.
 
TheXpert:
Do you know WHAT to program?
Of course I do. All I have to do is translate into programming code the methods I successfully use in manual trading.
 
Reshetov:
It's good that the administration is more adequate than some of the advisors and preferred the algorithmic programming language to OOP. It used to be known for sure that we could program only: Expert Advisors, scripts and technical indicators. A step to the right or to the left - dll. Now there is an OOP and freedom in the question: what to program. But along with the freedom of choice there are questions on the question: How to program? For the functionality has increased and is expanding all the time.

Diversity is great, but you left out the main question Why MT and not VS and the connector to any exchange gateway (including MT4)...

paladin800

If i dont know what to do about it, its not so important that i dont know what to do about it, and i dont know why to do it on MT.

 
St.Vitaliy:

Diversity is great, but you left out the main question Why MT and not VS and the connector to any exchange gateway (including MT4)...

paladin800

If i'm not mistaking, the market is not the place to start, and i'm not sure that it is the place for all those who are interested in trading, and i'm not sure that it is the place for all those who are interested in trading.

Is it difficult to guess that the resource is not warez, where people come to earn no matter how, and thematic, where people come from warez, having understood that it is possible to earn money on the net using anything, but it is more effective if the method of earning corresponds to competence. Lack of competence makes people switch to thematic resources from file dump sites.

MQ has not just thematic resources, but also a separate resource for each individual product with its own domain, so that people do not end up in a dump and know exactly where to look for the information they need.

 

I consider S# to be the most perfect platform for an algo-trader. The architecture itself is deeply thought out. The authors' team has a lot of experience in algo trading, all in one place.

MT5 has one, but very powerful advantage over others - the cloud. This is the result of the great programming experience of the developers.

95% of the time of algo-trading is research. And only 5% is writing TS based on research.

 
St.Vitaliy, why?

It's very simple - the question of "why MT" has been voiced and discussed many times. A ton of material has been written about it. The whole site is devoted to it. But few people want to waste their precious time on reading. People find it easier to play the one-way game "why didn't they instantly serve my mental request here and now?

Those who do information services in practice know that the one-liners of banal erudition don't work. No cataloguing, no tagging, no advice for newcomers. Huge numbers of improvement ideas increase efficiency by only a few percent (closer to 1 % rather than 9-10 %). And we've already introduced a lot of technical solutions.

So the main hope is to create more and more material and scale up coverage in the long term.
 
There's no deep forethought there, but a mega crutch of unfinished connectors. It's basically 2000 and a marginal niche with no future.

Compared to it, MT5 has a monstrously high level of control, quality and functionality.
Reason: