Why don't I read the articles? - page 17

[TheXpert]

Mischek:
Well, the ticks will still be generated and not timed and false arbitrage will occur.

Making decisions on closing prices only.

[михаил потапыч]

TheXpert:
Making decisions on closing prices only.

and we have every tick out of several dozen instruments )) no joke

[Dmitry Fedoseev]

wise:
He was talking about MT4 and multicurrency. So, yes, impossible.

Then what are we even talking about? What is the correspondence between the real and the tester?

[TheXpert]

Integer:

Then what are we even talking about? What is the correspondence between the real and the tester?

Well, roughly speaking, you can do anything on 4 because of the open history format. Unless there's a problem with real volumes. And even then I don't know.

[Aleksey]

One thing I don't understand. Why do they consider closing prices as a way out. The bar is closed at the expiry of the interval, and the last tick in it may be at the beginning of this interval or at the opening. For example, a bar opened at 15:30, closed at 16:00 and its last tick was at 15:31. What difference does it make whether it was the opening or the closing? It will be of no use anyway. Only with frequent gaps maybe...

[Vasiliy Sokolov]

Just don't fight hot Finnish guys:) Every terminal has its advantages and disadvantages. If you want to do market research - use WealthLab, if you trade on the Russian stock market? - Use S#, do you need FOREX? - Trade through MT5. Every terminal has its own specialisation and you do not have to meddle where someone else is better.

[TheXpert]

Mischek:
and we have every tick of a few dozen instruments )) no kidding.

Who do we have? I do, yeah.

[Vladimir]

C-4:

Just don't fight hot Finnish guys:) Every terminal has its advantages and disadvantages. If you want to do market research - use WealthLab, if you trade on the Russian stock market? - Use S#, you need FOREX? - Trade through MT5. Every terminal has its own specialisation and you do not have to meddle where someone else is better.

How is WealthLab better? I used to deal with it hard in my time. It crashes on every run. No technical support. Now I use WealthLab only for fundamental screen, but it is not good at all for automatic trading. It would be nice if MK offered their product to American stock brokers (Schwab, Fidelity, ScottsTrade,...), but there is almost nothing here except ThinkOrSwim and TradeStation. That would attract a huge number of users. In the US forex is not very widespread, and the government screws in the nuts like 50:1 maximum leverage.

[Anatoli Kazharski]

gpwr:
How is WealthLab better? I've been working hard on it in my time. It breaks down on every run. There is no technical support. Now I use WealthLab only for fundamental screen, but it is not good at all for automatic trading. It would be nice if MK offered their product to American stock brokers (Schwab, Fidelity, ScottsTrade,...), but there is almost nothing here except ThinkOrSwim and TradeStation. That would attract a huge number of users. In the US forex is not very widespread, and the government screws in nuts like 50:1 maximum leverage.

The states are the main target. We need to build up a position around it first. Seriously, it's already been voiced. ))

[михаил потапыч]

TheXpert:
Who's we got? I do, yeah.

I'm the editor of the wall newspaper.