
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I find it interesting to look at your signals, there are 2-3 weeks old, and already with subscribers. And who, I wonder, has subscribed? Isn't it the provider himself? Especially if the provider claims to be a legal entity, judging by the nickname.
Yes ... there is such a moment on your signal ... I think if you do not like it terribly you share your personal experience and with all ... #22 - published on 19.01.2017 - immediately found a subscriber and subscriber on the same day 19.01.2017.2017 wrote a great review and gave you 5 stars...he must have telepathically understood that everything will be fine...and also connected to 4 more of your signals and on the same day 19.01.2017 gave them 5 stars...coincidence? Maybe...but in this respect I support you...and I understand where you did not like it all...from a personal example...
Exactly right legal person broker
I think we've been discussing this, haven't we? Or shall we discuss it again?
I find it interesting to look at your signals, there are 2-3 weeks old, and already with subscribers. And who, I wonder, has subscribed? Isn't it the provider himself? Especially if the provider claims to be a legal entity, judging by the nickname.
the word "honest" was written to avoid asking uncomfortable questions, like this one...
I don't like to write too much (i.e., i don't know how to post about it), and i don't want to be bothered to tell you what i think.
I don't like to write (talk) much. I prefer to listen (read)... and draw conclusions.
I mean, I'm a "bachelor" today and I'm willing to answer questions if you're interested...
don't think of me as arrogant... it's just that I am very interested in learning more about people who are different from the majority...
(sounds bad...I don't know how else to write it...sorry if it sounds offensive)
Taras!
You have a decent and good result!
And it's not for nothing, I think that absolutely everyone has what he deserves.
Whether he wanted it consciously or not is another question.
Pay less attention to criticism, it makes no sense.
I can assume that this number of subscribers is not the limit.
Good luck in trading and reaching your goals!
I am aware of the topic of discussion. Do you consider everyone a spammer who asks you anything? Or is it forbidden in principle?
I was once at the top, and after 4 months had more than 20 subscribers. The number of them began to increase dramatically.
And the more they signed up for a cheap signal (mostly 20-40$), the more they asked stupid and dumb questions. All of this will throw you off balance, especially if you're a functioning programmer.
And if you think someone has 1200 subscribers and it's really good, I don't think so.
At that price, messing around with subscribers all day and having that kind of responsibility, it's not worth it. It is only from aside so good.
Taras!
You have a decent and good result!
And it's not for nothing, I think that absolutely everyone has what he deserves.
Whether he wanted it consciously or not is another question.
Pay less attention to criticism, it makes no sense.
I can assume that this number of subscribers is not the limit.
Good luck in trading and achieving your goals!
Taras is really good, but it's his position that's under discussion here and not his signal.
For example, there is no point in such trades at one and the same time the signal provider opens a lot of deals worsening the management. Normal traders just don't get into the rating.
Taras is really good, but we are discussing the situation here, not Taras' signal.
For example, there is no point in such trades at one and the same time the signal provider opens a bunch of trades worsening the management. Normal traders just don't get into the rating.
I think the robot is painfully familiar)
I will send you the link in your personal message.