Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 1077

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
yes, PRDF
Ok, then you can create a switch case and add a bunch of polynomials there and call the function randomly to choose one polynomial...then, why did you said GMDH instead of PNN...then??:))))))))))))))))))))))))
I mean I unnecessarily wrote such big for loops:))))))))...
So now just use the same function which I gave to you and replace the for loops by a single polynomial of some degree and then, call that function for every line...
I said "like gmdh feature selection" I think:
So now just use the same function which I gave to you and replace the for loops by a single polynomial of some degree and then, call that function for every line...
I mean one condition in switch case= one different polynomial which will be chosen randomly...Now you can write any number of polynomials as you want since there are no for loops:))))
If you want to me write...I can write as well...but I need some time to search for some good combinations...
By the way, for me to better understand your goal can you please explain me exactly what are you looking for or trying to achieve in terms of:
1.OOB LOSS and LOG LOSS...values or conditions etc?
2.Sharp ratio, profit factor, recovery factor etc. or these things don't matter due to overfitting?
Anything else based on on which we can decide the reliability of the system for LIVE trading?
I mean which parameters are you trying to achieve or increase etc.?
Now I think I can drop out 1-st 2 lines, because 3-d line do it all
But how are you going to drop out the lines?
Are you going to write the code for every feature ... I mean all the 100 features if we use 100 features :))
yes, I leave 1-st line and combine together 2 and 3, 3-d (now 2nd) line will consist of all 2 features variants
so 1-st step: we are choosing best predictors without polynomial transformations
2-nd step: combining all with which others with different polynomials, by adding 3-d predictor, where its multiplication of 2 predictors with different degrees
and next - need to combine these predictors from step 2 to which othersAre you sure this line is correct? I mean the syntax is correct?
My brain already hurts by seeing these 2D matrix and all that stuff and so just checking if the syntax is correct:))))))
nope, I will use all 3 lines, all good now )
But what next...:)) are you going to write 4th line, 5th line,....so on for all features?
now we have: best triple features, transformed with polynomials
can combine all best features now, adding 6 inputs, next 12 inputs and so on
and then can choose the best model over all
No...I want to know if you are going to write the code again and again for every feature or will the existing loops and code will do it all?
this strings now contain 1 unit, which takes 3 inputs
we can operate with these units now, multiply it, so it can takes 3+3+1 = 7 inputs
This is holy sh.t.Well, you decided to write it that way and till now I am not 100% sure as to why you are trying to write in that way... :)))
I am not an expert in writing programs of 2D arrays or matrix and hence, here my role is limited....
I can only understand important concepts quickly and help you somewhat to simplify things a little better... but you should know how to program it...:))))
I just try with 3 lines now, fixing an errors
if the error is reduced by line
OKKK ,, ..... Now I am getting closer in understanding why you are trying to implement in this way .... :))
If you want, you can provide me with the full code and I can try different variants of polynomials and it by replacing in this line:
now just some errors in heaps of loops . ^))) I try to fix
You mean syntax errors???...I thought LOG LOSS errors:)))))))))))