Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 670

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
i=i+2, not i++
Well, at each tick I just have a zero indicator buffer recalculated and that's it
Well, at each tick I just have a zero indicator buffer recalculated and that's it
Nonsense, I haven't noticed that in this case
nonsense, did not notice that
Maybe because the response from the scaffolding is slow, and while the buffers are filled, it does not output values? I dunno
not critical, but unpleasant
Show me the code.
I sent it in my personal, so that no one could copy it)
What is the backtest and forward bot?
I am testing with virtual trading, I have sent you the lib once. I have been testing it for the second week and I like the results. But I will not show it to you for now not to jinx it.)
And even more interesting to see the signal)
The signal was shown earlier. It is the MA of the 2nd period on the reversals and its modification as a filter.
In the two-class classification the forecast also gives signals, but it is worth trading only when filtering reversals.
The three-class classification is not instantaneous. However, the result is clearer, as you can see. Visually the number of classes is not equal but similar.
Code:
I am testing with virtual trading, I once sent you the libu. I have been testing for the second week, I like the results. But I will not show them yet, so as not to jinx them.)
I don't want my photons to spoil it :)
I have also finalized the indicator to my liking, so I'll test the bot soon
I'm reading a book.
Elliott_Timmermann.A_handbook_of_economic_forecasting
The readings are:
1. Why the difficulty with forecasting?
2. What to do?
I'm reading a book.
Elliott_Timmermann.A_handbook_of_economic_forecasting
The readings are:
1. Why the difficulty with forecasting?
2. What to do?
Everything works smoother in the stock market/indices, and interrelationships are good.
Forex is the tightest market in this respect.
In the stock market, everything works more evenly, and there are good interdirectional correlations.
Forex is the tightest market in this respect.
And why bother if the stock/index market is easier? Go to the stock market - futures, options. Everything is easier, you say. Or you can't part with MT? ))
There are many who say that the conditions at the stock exchange are worse. Do you know why? The leverage is smaller, which means there is nothing to do there with $.00. I think that with $100 there is nothing to do on the Forex market either.) On the other hand, if you lose, it's kind of a pity.) If you win, it's a pittance, but it's nice.
And why bother if the stock/index market is easier? Go to the stock exchange - futures, options. Everything is easier, you say. Or you cannot part with MT? ))
There are many who say that the conditions at the stock exchange are worse. Do you know why? The leverage is smaller, which means there is nothing to do there with $.00. I think that with $100 there is nothing to do on the Forex market either.) On the other hand, if you lose, it's kind of a pity.) And if you win - a trifle, but pleasant.
If you win, it's nice to win. If you lose, it's not worth it, and if you win, it's good to win.
And in general multicurrencies are prescribed for MO because the signs are real fundamentally grounded.
When I started to trade on the futures market, I tried to think about the difference between the two types of MT5, but now I don't know how to fill it up, because MT5 is connected to European CQG and AMP servers are not co-located with the exchange.