Discussion of article "Basic math behind Forex trading"
great article !
I read it diagonally quickly, now I read it again, but slowly :-)
I would like to make "notes in the margins", which is almost the first time in local publications.
----------
Тестируя советник или ручную стратегию со случайным открытием и используя StopLoss и TakeProfit, выбранные совершенно случайно, тем не менее получим всегда один неслучайный результат
It's not only non-random, it's also very cool. The result will be shifted to the places/areas/times of maximum volatility. The moment of entry is random, the moment of exit is not. At any SL/TP
And immediately follows the "cry of Yaroslavna" about the removal of stops, DC conspiracy and unknown puppet :-) It's just a game of probability
It is similar to my article, but in different words and with different pictures). And non-networks themselves are not a panacea, they will not work just like that, you need that profitable idea of using non-networks. But in the end, neural networks are just a tool. Convenient, universal with proven mathematical properties. One and the same problem can be solved with the help of both networks and other mechanisms.
In the word neural network I put a little more extensive concept, and so it is certainly not a panacea. I'm rather already thinking about AI. I know that neural networks have different architectures and each for a specific task. I haven't had time to deal with this issue, but I'm slowly writing my own version. Maybe in the future when I finish the software I will make an article about my neural network. It's just that time is very limited.
great article !
I read it diagonally quickly, now I read it again, but slowly :-)
I would like to make "notes in the margins", which is almost the first time in local publications.
----------
It's not only non-random, it's also very cool. The result will be shifted to the places/areas/times of maximum volatility. The moment of entry is random, the moment of exit is not. At any SL/TP
And immediately follows the "cry of Yaroslavna" about the removal of stops, DC conspiracy and unknown puppet :-) It's just a game of probability
Thanks, actually the article is not really strong, my first article. I think I should have the next article up in a week. It will be more interesting ). I actually thought I was going to get nailed).
Thanks, it's not really a strong article, it's my first one. I think I should have the next one done in a week. It will be more interesting.) I actually thought I was going to get nailed).
Hate is an internet engine. It's worse when nothing is said.
The article is very realistic - a good lesson for beginners to get a feel for the complexity of the profession of a trader and developer.
A small clarification - "filling with limiters and parsing with market ones" is more about the stock market, not about forex.
Forex does not have exchange pricing, as the market itself is over-the-counter, with much more liquidity.
Therefore, the role of limit orders (and these are pending orders) is much less in the forex market than in the stock market.
The article is realistic - a good lesson for beginners to feel the complexity of the profession of a trader and developer.
A small clarification - "filling with limiters and dismantling with market ones" - this is more about the stock market, not about forex.
Forex does not have exchange pricing, as the market itself is over-the-counter, with much more liquidity.
Therefore, the role of limit orders (and these are pending orders) is much less in the forex market than in the stock market.
It looks like my article, only in different words and with different pictures)
It is not surprising, since you and your colleague "discover" the same model - a discrete Markov chain. On the one hand, this is not bad - usually only SBs were "discovered" here before)
On the other hand - you may not have enough life to "discover" theorising in the necessary volume on your own). Also, there is always a problem with discussion of such "discoveries" because of different variants of self-made terminology.
An article with recommendations on grids and martins. This is the death of the deposit !
Let me explain by example. When optimising such startegies, parameters are selected in such a way as to pass a difficult section. I.e. at the beginning of the section we have no positions and at the most critical moment the number of positions and lots is maximum. On a real account, it is unlikely to approach a bad market section without accumulated positions. hence, a drawdown. New optimisation and again a loss.
This is not surprising, since you and your colleague "discover" the same model - a discrete Markov chain. On the one hand, this is not bad - usually only SBs have been "discovered" here before)
On the other hand - you may not have enough life to "discover" theorising in the necessary volume on your own). Also, there is always a problem with discussion of such "discoveries" because of different variants of self-made terminology.
This is the problem with theorver and games. No stability and stability)))) Always some discoveries in a random world)))) Terminology does not have time to take root))))
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
New article Basic math behind Forex trading has been published:
The article aims to describe the main features of Forex trading as simply and quickly as possible, as well as share some basic ideas with beginners. It also attempts to answer the most tantalizing questions in the trading community along with showcasing the development of a simple indicator.
If you know where to enter and exit the market, you probably don't need to know anything else. Unfortunately, the issue of entry/exit points is an elusive one. At first glance, you can always identify a pattern and follow it for a while. But how to detect it without sophisticated tools and indicators? The simplest and always recurring patterns are TREND and FLAT. Trend is a long-term movement in one direction, while Flat implies more frequent reversals.
These patterns can be easily detected since a human eye can find them without any indicators. The main issue here is that we can see a pattern only after it has been triggered. Moreover, no one can guarantee there has been any pattern at all. No pattern can save your deposit from destruction regardless of a strategy. I will try to provide possible reasons for this using the language of math.
Author: Evgeniy Ilin