Discussion of article "Exploring Seasonal Patterns of Financial Time Series with Boxplot" - page 19
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
sharing my opinion
Unfortunately, no arguments. Just personal attacks.
Unfortunately, no arguments. Just personal attacks.
and I don't complain to moderators about flooding in the thread from you ;)
I'm not going to play sophisms with you.
and I don't complain to the moderators about the flooding in the thread from you ;)
I'm not going to play sophisms with you.
You seem like a grown man. If there are clear formulations where I was wrong, let me know. I'm not interested in the rest.
He seems like a grown man. If you have a clear statement of where I went wrong, let me know. I'm not interested in the rest.
Just fludding off the topic of the article, not interested in discussing details
Just fludding off topic of the article,
Author, then what is this shit doing here?
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Discussion of the article "Investigation of seasonal characteristics of financial time series using Boxplot diagrams"
Maxim Dmitrievsky, 2019.12.09 12:52 pm.
Some characters have a hidden protest: "How so, we have been optimising all our lives, falling kernels, and this upstart has shown how easy and playful it is to find a seasonal pattern".
Denying the results of the article, trying not to recognise them is a subconscious defence. Moreover, the method is so simple and intuitive that it stings twice as much and makes you feel bombastic.
I'm not interested in discussing the details.
Unfortunately.
Author, then what the fuck is this shit doing here?
Unfortunately.
This is specifically about you and a few others. Bullshit or no bullshit, you make your own reputation.
I'm not interested in one thing and one thing only, cry in private.
I didn't expect such nonsense from Igor at all. He couldn't even make a proper bot to check it, he doesn't understand at all :)
So, the level of the article is unattainable for 99%, you need to write even more simply
clogging the brain with unnecessary words
at least I was able to help the author of the article! ))))
once again, what I'm writing about - the article itself is interesting from the point of view, here is the methodology of estimation with the help of Python and statistics - everything is great! but how to use this methodology for work.... I think it's just fantasy.
imho, in such cases, when a good mathematical toolkit once again does not work for the CR, you should not force it to work in any way.
here in general the result of the whole conversation about this is like a great and expensive microscope to learn how to hammer ordinary nails into wooden boards, in my opinion there are more practical tools for this.
at least I was able to help the author of the article! ))))
once again, what I'm writing about - the article itself is interesting from the point of view, here is the methodology of estimation with the help of Python and statistics - everything is great! but how to use this methodology for work.... in my opinion only fantasies
imho, in such cases when a good mat.toolkit once again does not work for CR, you should not make it work in any way.
here in general the result of the whole conversation about this is like a great and expensive microscope to learn how to hammer ordinary nails into wooden boards, in my opinion there are more practical tools for this.
one week ban for flooding
one week ban for flooding
Why flud? - this is my opinion, and it does not have to coincide with yours, especially I wrote my conclusions after reading the article and discussing it.
I see no point in discussing further, I am not afraid of enemies, but it is just not interesting to explain the obvious, you think that the methodology works..... well, as it is known on this forum - go to the real! ;)