Discussion of article "Do Traders Need Services From Developers?" - page 8

New comment
 
papaklass:

In my opinion, the TOP is not needed at all. :)

The presence of the TOP creates prerequisites for various kinds of frauds. And as a result of fighting against this, developers have to spend effort to create various filters to counteract these machinations. Developments in 45 seconds have already been mentioned here.

There is a problem in the Service: at the initial stage (TOR discussion) both the customer and the developer discuss something that cannot be "touched with hands".

Suggestion:

1. The customer puts his wishes on the tender. For example, we need an Expert Advisor on 2 moving averages with the possibility of setting a trailing stop.

2. Executors willing to participate in the tender, provide the customer with protected versions of advisors with a description of its work and indicate their prices. The good MC guarantees protection from decompilation.

3. The customer tries the submitted works and chooses the executor and his EA for further work.

4. They draw up TOR for improving the EA.

Although this scheme is not free from the principle "make a fool pray to God and he will break his forehead".

But when organising the work of the Service according to this scheme:

1. There is no need to fight for getting to the TOP;

2. The customer and the executor discuss a specific advisor. The customer can clearly formulate the aspects that he is not satisfied with in the work of the advisor and what needs to be added, corrected, etc.

I wish you with all my soul that your children work all their lives on such a principle.
 
C-4:
I think it's already started. This is noticeable in the segment of experts. When the market started, experts were $2,000-$3,000. There were even more expensive. Now a lot of junk experts are sold for $200 - $300. Buyers are mostly unqualified. If there are two beautiful pictures, one priced at $2,000 and the other at $200, they will buy the one for $200, sincerely believing that they are the same.

It looks logical, but in practice our market has interesting peculiarities:

  1. who has high prices from $1000, he sets records for earnings. most of all in this segment is earned
  2. those with prices up to $50 set records for the number of sales.

Look at the wall - it is easily traceable there.

 
Integer:
I wish you with all my soul that your children work their whole lives along these lines.
This is where I wish I had a forum barker.....
 
Renat:
This is where I wish I had a forum barker....
So what's in the way ;) It's all in your hands.
 
artmedia70:
So what's in the way ;) It's all in your hands.
Why limit yourself? Give emoticons and likes).
 
C-4:
You sound convincing. Why don't you tell me the secret to success? How many hours a day do you work? How do you win "tenders" for orders?
There are many books devoted to successful people. And there are a lot of readers of these books who think that they [books] will help them become successful... but either the books lie, or the readers, for various reasons, are not (and never will be) able to climb to the top of success....
 
zfs:
Why limit yourself. Give emoticons and likes).
Facepalm and likes. No more.
 
artmedia70:
Facepalm and a like. That's all I need.
So Like and Anti Like).
 
zfs:
So Like and Anti-Like).
I suggested this and almost got pelted with tomatoes).
 

And on the topic, traders mostly need martingale robots -

write some template and change only indicators, easy fast and cheap. Gotta try it,)

123456789
New comment