i have a bug that sometimes, when my ea sends a new order to server, it will open multiple orders until it reaches my maximum limit of allowed trades. And after doing research on the web, it is very common bug, but i have found almost 0 way to get around it or stop it from occuring. It rarely happens, but when it does it is a pita. Can you tell me that your execution code has same bug?
I haven't faced an issue like yours. But if you provide your code maybe i can help you and also check if that issue exist on the MQL_Easy framework.
Hello,
I run the example , but it doesn't stop in the chart window.
Can you help me?
Thanks.
Hello,
I run the example , but it doesn't stop in the chart window.
Can you help me?
Thanks.
Yes, of course.
I will need more information about your issue.
What do you mean by "it doesn't stop in the chart window" ?
The script does the following:
1) open a trade
2) modify the sl and tp
3) modify again
4) and finally close that trade.
Which steps do you see happening and which you don't?
Also, check at the Experts tab if there is any error message.
Regards
Yes, of course.
I will need more information about your issue.
What do you mean by "it doesn't stop in the chart window"
?
The script does the following:
1) open a trade
2) modify the sl and tp
3) modify again
4) and
finally close that trade.
Which steps do you see happening and which you don't?
Also, check at the Experts tab if
there is any error message.
Regards
Hello,
thanks for your reply.
What happens is that I don't have enough time to see what the program does.
It's too quick.
Thanks.
Hello,
thanks for your reply.
What happens is that I don't have enough time to see what the program does.
It's too quick.
Thanks.
Hello Dionisis,
I want to extend CPosition such that I can select a group of positions depending their direction (long vs short) as well as profit (positive vs negative). I was considering either creating my own enum for all 7 combinations or use your original GROUP_POSITIONS enum in addition to a boolean member in my subclass (e.g. bool in_profit) -- something like the excerpt below... any suggestion what the best approach might be?
enum GROUP_POSITIONS { GROUP_POSITIONS_ALL = -1, GROUP_POSITIONS_BUYS = 0, GROUP_POSITIONS_SELLS = 1 }; class CPositionProfit : public CPosition { protected: bool in_profit; // ... } //////////////////////////////////////// enum GROUP_POSITIONS_PROFIT { GROUP_POSITIONS_ALL = -1, GROUP_POSITIONS_BUYS = 0, GROUP_POSITIONS_SELLS = 1, GROUP_POSITIONS_BUY_POS = 2, GROUP_POSITIONS_SELL_POS = 3, GROUP_POSITIONS_BUY_NEG = 4, GROUP_POSITIONS_SELL_NEG = 5 }; class CPositionProfit : public CPosition { //... }
Would you like me to send you a pull request with my new class(es) once I'm done? Btw, do you welcome or accept contributions that are more stylistic as opposed to functional to your own code base?
Cheers,
DD
PS: I'm thinking I might need to override CPositionBase::ValidPosition() too, but not sure it would be possible.

- www.mql5.com
Hello Dionisis,
I want to extend CPosition such that I can select a group of positions depending their direction (long vs short) as well as profit (positive vs negative). I was considering either creating my own enum for all 7 combinations or use your original GROUP_POSITIONS enum in addition to a boolean member in my subclass (e.g. bool in_profit) -- something like the excerpt below... any suggestion what the best approach might be?
Would you like me to send you a pull request with my new class(es) once I'm done? Btw, do you welcome or accept contributions that are more stylistic as opposed to functional to your own code base?
Cheers,
DD
PS: I'm thinking I might need to override CPositionBase::ValidPosition() too, but not sure it would be possible.
Hi,
Of course, you are welcome to any contribution! Just one thing, we need to follow the same naming conventions style in order to
keep it clean and beautiful.
For example, the 'in_profit' property should be renamed like 'InProfit' as the whole library follows
the same styling.
Regards
Hi,
This looks like a great library! I am still experimenting and getting familiar with it.
When I tried some simple tests in the MT4 strategy tester I keep getting error messages in the journal that the selected symbol doesn't exist.
Such as "EURUSD,M15: Message : The symbol EURUSD doesn't exist."
My work around hack is:
bool CUtilitiesBase::CheckSymbol(string symbolPar) { if(IsTesting()){return true;} ...... }
Which seems to work fine.
Is this a bug? Or limitation?
Has anybody else had problems using this library with the mt4 tester?
Hi,
This looks like a great library! I am still experimenting and getting familiar with it.
When I tried some simple tests in the MT4 strategy tester I keep getting error messages in the journal that the selected symbol doesn't exist.
Such as "EURUSD,M15: Message : The symbol EURUSD doesn't exist."
My work around hack is:
Which seems to work fine.
Is this a bug? Or limitation?
Has anybody else had problems using this library with the mt4 tester?
Hi,
Thank you!
I verify that SymbolSelect has issue with the StrategyTester. The problem may occurs on the fact that the symbols of the strategy tester are
the symbols on Market watch by default.
So, i will make an update to the framework with following change:
bool CUtilitiesBase::CheckSymbol(string symbolPar) { bool isSelected = SymbolInfoInteger(symbolPar,SYMBOL_SELECT); bool symbolCheck = (!isSelected) ? SymbolSelect(symbolPar,true) : true; if(!symbolCheck){ this.Error.CreateErrorCustom("The symbol "+symbolPar+" doesn't exist."); return false; } return true; }
Regards

- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
MQL_Easy:
A cross platform library/framework
Author: Dionisis Nikolopoulos