Does a safe Martingale exist ? - page 14

[whisperer]

PascalD:
Mean reversion and martingale are supposed to be different things, aren't they? Trading within expected range and trading regardless of the range could never be the same

In general they should be different (different way of risk handling)

[iGoR]

PascalD:
Mean reversion and martingale are supposed to be different things, aren't they? Trading within expected range and trading regardless of the range could never be the same

Correct.

In my previous posting I told him already that he's not making any sence. But he does not want to listen or he does not know the definition of martingale...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean_reversion)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale)

2 totally different subjects.

[tampa]

There is no safe martingale

[whisperer]

tampa:
There is no safe martingale

Don't tell that to the believers

[Pascal]

whisperer:
Don't tell that to the believers

You mean traders?

[name]

PascalD:

You mean traders?

Nagh, we don't believe anythings

[myname]

on my own:

Nagh, we don't believe anythings

Majority does (believe). One of the 95% failure reasons

[Chris]

Why so greedy that you need to make back Every PIP of every loss every time as soon as it loses???

yourthebest

[sreenewas]

s there will be safe martingale method, if there will be any low consecutive failure trading system with equal risk reward ratio,

[name]

shiva12:
s there will be safe martingale method, if there will be any low consecutive failure trading system with equal risk reward ratio,

Coin toss method is almost 50:50 RR