Dynamic zone indicators ... - page 146
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Do we have it for mt5?
In case someone is wondering why there are no new dynamic zone indicators ...
The thing is simple : actually there are, and a lot of them.
To clarify it : dynamic zones and floating levels are very similar in results. So similar (difference exists but it can be neglected) that I decided to use floating levels instead - for multiple reasons :
So, all the floating level version that were posted lately can be as easily named dynamic zone versions.
In case someone is wondering why there are no new dynamic zone indicators ...
The thing is simple : actually there are, and a lot of them.
To clarify it : dynamic zones and floating levels are very similar in results. So similar (difference exists but it can be neglected) that I decided to use floating levels instead - for multiple reasons :
So, all the floating level version that were posted lately can be as easily named dynamic zone versions.
Dearest MLADEN
So all in all fl are far better than dz/ddz due to multiple reasons.
regards
I still prefer DZ. It's like between EMA and SMA, where I prefer EMA.
Dearest MLADEN
So all in all fl are far better than dz/ddz due to multiple reasons.
regards
They are having results so similar, then, due to the reasons I stated in that post, it is easier and much more efficient to use floating levels
Being the results are so similar, we can not say that one way is better than the other - we can say that the results are usable in the same manner
The results are very similar, but you must fine tune it to get the same results. (Example is not tuned to the market.)
It's just a personal preference, nothing logical behind it. DZ look a bit cooler ;)
...hold on...I'm getting dz...
The results are very similar, but you must fine tune it to get the same results. (Example is not tuned to the market.)
It's just a personal preference, nothing logical behind it. DZ look a bit cooler ;)
Got spanked?To make it completely transparent and clear ...
Here are two versions that can be compared to the dynamic zones smoothed rsi from the first page of this thread. One is floating levels version and the other is a quantile bands version
As it can be seen, quantile bands is almost identical to dz version, Floating levels version has more differences, but frankly, I can not decide which one is better (out of the 3). Floating levels version is very, very fast. Quantile bands also. Dz is having that issue with speed for longer periods and precision that needs to be adjusted but apart from that, results are acceptable. So, it seems to be up to personal preference
To make it completely transparent and clear ...
Here are two versions that can be compared to the dynamic zones smoothed rsi from the first page of this thread. One is floating levels version and the other is a quantile bands version
As it can be seen, quantile bands is almost identical to dz version, Floating levels version has more differences, but frankly, I can not decide which one is better (out of the 3). Floating levels version is very, very fast. Quantile bands also. Dz is having that issue with speed for longer periods and precision that needs to be adjusted but apart from that, results are acceptable. So, it seems to be up to personal preference