Everything about RSI - page 131

 

Sort of a uber fooling around : this is Laguerre RSI of RSI

Even though it sounds crazy, the comparison to the regular RSI is not bad - not bad at all. To the extent that RSI is loosing for any longer period (and I mean any)


Files:
 

Please 

Can this make more user friendly (like pict) and include MTF with alerts on cross middle,top and bottom level ?

Thank you in advance

Files:
 
Melajah_Forex:

Please 

Can this make more user friendly (like pict) and include MTF with alerts on cross middle,top and bottom level ?

Thank you in advance

Check this post (among others from that thread) : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/176844/page5
 
mladen:
Check this post (among others from that thread) : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/176844/page5

Yea,,, Thank you

Another question about your RSI heatmap, are they use fixed maximum minimum? I ask because i really like RSI with big period too select pair

Files:
level.jpg  222 kb
 
Melajah_Forex:

Yea,,, Thank you

Another question about your RSI heatmap, are they use fixed maximum minimum? I ask because i really like RSI with big period too select pair

In rsi heatmap changing fixed minimum and maximum would not change anything (fixed minimum and maximum levels are significant only when historical values are displayed - RSI heatmap does not do that)
 
mladen:
In rsi heatmap changing fixed minimum and maximum would not change anything (fixed minimum and maximum levels are significant only when historical values are displayed - RSI heatmap does not do that)
Ok thank you so much
 

R-squared adaptive rsx (as it is known, rsx is the smoother rsi) posted here : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/180002/page63


 

Dearest mladen

Please help me, can you make modification the histogram of in this indicator just like RSI histogram on my 2nd subwindows ?

 

Please ......... 

 
Melajah_Forex:

Dearest mladen

Please help me, can you make modification the histogram of in this indicator just like RSI histogram on my 2nd subwindows ?

 

Please ......... 

Why that one (I mean the double cci)? Wouldn't some "simple" be better?
 
mladen:
Why that one (I mean the double cci)? Wouldn't some "simple" be better?

Can you point me which one is your prefer PLEASE......... 

Reason: