Requests & Ideas, the beginning - page 105
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Been checking it So far haven't found where the errors(s) are
thanks for your time and help...
actually we need to find the way where it takes the trade only when there is a osma cross in lower timeframe and other 2 higher time frames should use only for confirmation...
i dont know anything about coding so i cant tell you exactly what to do but we need to stop the ea taking trades when osma cross 0 in higher time frames...
once we can solve this we can discuss about exit...
thanks
Dear Mladen do you think its possible to transform the lines from ccfp_mtf_amp_alerts_2.03_nmc.mq4 in oscillators between 0 and 100 (or -100 and +100)?
Dear Mladen do you think its possible to transform the lines from ccfp_mtf_amp_alerts_2.03_nmc.mq4 in oscillators between 0 and 100 (or -100 and +100)?
rosalieone
Check these posts (the part about different types of normalizations) and let me know what you think : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/179686____________
PS: whatever normalization type is used, the crosses will change its places
Must we understand that the lognormal (mentioned by Simba) is the one ?
rosalieone
Check these posts (the part about different types of normalizations) and let me know what you think : https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/179686____________
PS: whatever normalization type is used, the crosses will change its placesMust we understand that the lognormal (mentioned by Simba) is the one ?
Unfortunately there is no such thing as "best way of normalization". Whatever way we use, there will be some degree of "deforming" the original data. That is why I told that crosses will change places : because the data will be "deformed"
You said some years ago that for you momentum was one of the most useful tools.
Do you think that applying momentum to the lines could be interesting ?
Unfortunately there is no such thing as "best way of normalization". Whatever way we use, there will be some degree of "deforming" the original data. That is why I told that crosses will change places : because the data will be "deformed"
You said some years ago that for you momentum was one of the most useful tools. Do you think that applying momentum to the lines could be interesting ?
rosalieone
In this case no.
I will try to make a choice of normalizations and then you will be able to chose which method to use and which method you like the best in the case of that indicator
Thanks, ok
Could be interesting to see ccfp under another angle
I really believe in the power of ccfp
rosalieone
In this case no.
I will try to make a choice of normalizations and then you will be able to chose which method to use and which method you like the best in the case of that indicatorThanks, ok
Could be interesting to see ccfp under another angle
I really believe in the power of ccfprosalieone
Just to let you know : I am working on it. As soon as it gets done, it will be posted
Thanks maestro
rosalieone Just to let you know : I am working on it. As soon as it gets done, it will be posted