can anyone make SuperSignals not repaint?
anyway, 4 holly grail you better use Super Signals
sorry that is not possible the reason is nature of super signal check highers' high and lowers' low.
can someone confirm if the attached indicator repaints?
thanks for the heads up
Thanks for the Great Work !!
I'm interested with HMA4 Indi's, can make CHOICE use LINE or DOT with CHANGE in DrawDOT Setting. This Indi got REPAINT !
Would you like HELP to FIX It ? I'm NOT Programmer and need This Indi.
I appreciated for that's... Thank's before
regarding repaint indicator , that repaint a TOO PERFECT picture for historical chart while it is horrible in USING it
see the programming DIG -- the Question would be, did I identify the factor (I might get it wrong , as I try to say most programming practice are WRONG)
and if we eradicate the array SIMPLY, can we create an indicator that have NO REPAINT ISSUE, not so perfect in prediction, but HONEST
in the DIG,
I am sure the
" for(i = 0; i < limit; i++)"
mean i is the CANDLE number
while the most recent one , are the smallest number
i.e. the biggest number ( # limit, when i is equal to limit) is the further LEFT candle that this indicator is processed
i.e. when we count the candle by hand -- from RIGHT to LEFT
we should count 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 (remember count the candle toward the LEFT hand side)
in other words
if we just change how the ARRAY process
from LIMIT back to zero
will the INDICATOR show the TRUE FACE and its predictability ??
i.e. we can distinguish whether which indicator is useful, which is useless and all got no repaint issue instantly
the programmer do it because recent , latest candle is more vital to be updated
but is the LOGIC of the Traditional cliche practice is WRONG ??
But imagine if SS didn't repaint. Wouldn't that be amazing?
Just 5 names
It would be really nice if some of the experts here writte almost 5 names of indicators that REALLY REALLY dont repaint, please, for all the newbies like me.
ThAnKs A lOt