Solar wind - page 7

 

how to use solar wind,always refresh......who know the indicator like solar wind are no refresh and repaint?

 

solar wind.....love u and hate u so much.....who is the create of solar wind ?

keep refresh and repaint ....? is it just look nice like super arrow?

 
fxbs:
but i think it's Newdigital or Increase ...

It wasn't me, but I think it is based on Fisher, here is one that does not repaint

Files:
fisher1.mq4  7 kb
 

Solar Wind (or wrong coded Fisher by J.Ehlers) looks unreally good because takes data from the future and uses like previous values.

Just for info:

It's link to the site of scammer No 1 on Ebay (nickname setslav).

So-called ED_Discepline(Easy Day System) is Solar Wind(or Fisher_Yur4ik).

Moreover in the main window you can see PriceChannel_Stop.

Please beware of this scammer.

Avril Lavigne:
solar wind.....love u and hate u so much.....who is the create of solar wind ? keep refresh and repaint ....? is it just look nice like super arrow?
 

Indicators

Like about 99% of forex indicators in existence, they all repaint and as a result are not reliable. The modified Solar Wind does not repaint, also does not do much for helping you get into a position at a decent time, plus it is choppy at best.

Dave

 
Dave137:
Like about 99% of forex indicators in existence, they all repaint and as a result are not reliable. The modified Solar Wind does not repaint, also does not do much for helping you get into a position at a decent time, plus it is choppy at best. Dave

Maybe 99% is too much.

e.g. 1 MT4 comes by default with 30 indicator and none repaints.

e.g. 2 I have near 500 indicators between standard and customized and none repaints.

 
Linuxser:
Maybe 99% is too much.

e.g. 1 MT4 comes by default with 30 indicator and none repaints.

e.g. 2 I have near 500 indicators between standard and customized and none repaints.

Agreed. In fact the majority of those "out there" that do repaint do so because of sloppy programming. In some instances, it is admittedly far easier to be 'sloppy' - the indicator VQI is just one case in point. It stook me a serious amount of time to program this correctly, and at the end of the day, the 'original' displays exactly the same signals. But one (major) plus is that I can backtest stuff that uses it in a fraction of the time...

 
omelette:
Agreed. In fact the majority of those "out there" that do repaint do so because of sloppy programming. In some instances, it is admittedly far easier to be 'sloppy' - the indicator VQI is just one case in point. It stook me a serious amount of time to program this correctly, and at the end of the day, the 'original' displays exactly the same signals. But one (major) plus is that I can backtest stuff that uses it in a fraction of the time...

that's great, Omelette! I can't find VQI - can you give a link or it not been posted yet?

 
fxbs:
that's great, Omelette! I can't find VQI - can you give a link or it not been posted yet?

The original version is available in the VQI thread:

https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/general

My version hasn't been posted, nor will it be. Sorry.

 

sorry Increase, ND!

you understand - it was a joke in Stochastic thread

some info about work on SolarWind_clean from couple of monts ago:

here (mtf thread)

https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/173574/page84

here https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/178141/page2

and some details here https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/173574/page85

posts 1276, 1277

Reason: