Harmonic Trading - page 44

 

ziko,

and now the code for the GARTLEY 222, A SIMPLER CODE THAT DOES NOT PRODUCE AS MANY SIGNALS, BUT IS MORE RELIABLE THAN THE gartley

Inputs:

Length(100),

Strength(8),

Tolerance(0.10),

BullColor(Blue),

BearColor(Red);

Variables:

F1(0.618),

F2(0.786),

F3(1.27),

F4(1.618),

P1Bar(-1),

P2Bar(-1),

T1Bar(-1),

T2Bar(-1),

P1(0.0),

P2(0.0),

T1(0.0),

T2(0.0),

PTValid(False),

HLValid(False),

InZone(False),

GD(0.0),

XA(0.0),

AB(0.0),

BC(0.0),

CD(0.0),

AD(0.0),

C1(False),

C2(False),

C3(False),

C4(False),

ABdXA(0.0),

BCdAB(0.0),

CDdBC(0.0),

ADdXA(0.0),

TL1(-1),

TL2(-1),

TL3(-1),

TL4(-1),

TL5(-1),

TL6(-1);

P1Bar = SwingHighBar(1, High, Strength, Length);

P2Bar = SwingHighBar(2, High, Strength, Length);

T1Bar = SwingLowBar(1, Low, Strength, Length);

T2Bar = SwingLowBar(2, Low, Strength, Length);

If P1Bar -1 and

P2Bar -1 and

T1Bar -1 and

T2Bar -1 Then Begin

{Test for a bullish 222}

{Trough X is T2}

T2 = Low[T2Bar];

{Peak A is P2}

P2 = High[P2Bar];

{Trough B is T1}

T1 = Low[T1Bar];

{Peak C is P1}

P1 = High[P1Bar];

{D is the buy point}

GD = Low;

PTValid = P1Bar < T1Bar and T1Bar < P2Bar and P2Bar < T2Bar;

HLValid = P1 T2 and P1 > T1;

InZone = GD T2 and P2 >= Highest(High, T2Bar);

If PTValid and HLValid and InZone Then Begin

XA = P2 - T2;

AB = P2 - T1;

BC = P1 - T1;

CD = P1 - GD;

AD = P2 - GD;

ABdXA = AB / XA; {AB should be 61.8% of XA}

C1 = ABdXA > F1 - Tolerance and ABdXA < F1 + Tolerance;

BCdAB = BC / AB; {BC should be 61.8-78.6% of AB}

C2 = BCdAB > F1 - Tolerance and BCdAB < F2 + Tolerance;

CDdBC = CD / BC; {CD should be 127-161.8% of BC}

C3 = CDdBC > F3 - Tolerance and CDdBC < F4 + Tolerance;

ADdXA = AD / XA; {AD should be 78.6% of XA}

C4 = ADdXA > F2 - Tolerance and ADdXA < F2 + Tolerance;

If C1 and C2 and C3 and C4 Then Begin

TL1 = TL_New(Date[T2Bar], Time[T2Bar], T2, Date[P2Bar], Time[P2Bar], P2);

If TL1 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL1, BullColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL1, Tool_Solid);

TL_SetSize(TL1, 2);

End;

TL2 = TL_New(Date[P2Bar], Time[P2Bar], P2, Date[T1Bar], Time[T1Bar], T1);

If TL2 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL2, BullColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL2, Tool_Solid);

TL_SetSize(TL2, 2);

End;

TL3 = TL_New(Date[T1Bar], Time[T1Bar], T1, Date[P1Bar], Time[P1Bar], P1);

If TL3 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL3, BullColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL3, Tool_Solid);

TL_SetSize(TL3, 2);

End;

TL4 = TL_New(Date[P1Bar], Time[P1Bar], P1, Date, Time, GD);

If TL4 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL4, BullColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL4, Tool_Solid);

TL_SetSize(TL4, 2);

End;

TL5 = TL_New(Date[T1Bar], Time[T1Bar], T1, Date, Time, GD);

If TL5 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL5, BullColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL5, Tool_Dotted);

End;

TL6 = TL_New(Date[T2Bar], Time[T2Bar], T2, Date, Time, GD);

If TL6 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL6, BullColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL6, Tool_Dotted);

End;

End;

End;

{Test for a bearish 222}

{Peak X is P2}

{Trough A is T2}

{Peak B is P1}

{Trough C is T1}

{GD is the short point}

GD = High;

PTValid = T1Bar < P1Bar and P1Bar < T2Bar and T2Bar < P2Bar;

HLValid = T1 > T2 and P1 < P2 and T1 < P1;

InZone = GD > P1 and GD < P2 and T2 <= Lowest(Low, P2Bar);

If PTValid and HLValid and InZone Then Begin

XA = P2 - T2;

AB = P1 - T2;

BC = P1 - T1;

CD = GD - T1;

AD = GD - T2;

ABdXA = AB / XA; {AB should be 61.8% of XA}

C1 = ABdXA > F1 - Tolerance and ABdXA < F1 + Tolerance;

BCdAB = BC / AB; {BC should be 61.8-78.6% of AB}

C2 = BCdAB > F1 - Tolerance and BCdAB < F2 + Tolerance;

CDdBC = CD / BC; {CD should be 127-161.8% of BC}

C3 = CDdBC > F3 - Tolerance and CDdBC < F4 + Tolerance;

ADdXA = AD / XA; {AD should be 78.6% of XA}

C4 = ADdXA > F2 - Tolerance and ADdXA < F2 + Tolerance;

If C1 and C2 and C3 and C4 Then Begin

TL1 = TL_New(Date[P2Bar], Time[P2Bar], P2, Date[T2Bar], Time[T2Bar], T2);

If TL1 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL1, BearColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL1, Tool_Solid);

TL_SetSize(TL1, 2);

End;

TL2 = TL_New(Date[T2Bar], Time[T2Bar], T2, Date[P1Bar], Time[P1Bar], P1);

If TL2 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL2, BearColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL2, Tool_Solid);

TL_SetSize(TL2, 2);

End;

TL3 = TL_New(Date[P1Bar], Time[P1Bar], P1, Date[T1Bar], Time[T1Bar], T1);

If TL3 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL3, BearColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL3, Tool_Solid);

TL_SetSize(TL3, 2);

End;

TL4 = TL_New(Date[T1Bar], Time[T1Bar], T1, Date, Time, GD);

If TL4 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL4, BearColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL4, Tool_Solid);

TL_SetSize(TL4, 2);

End;

TL5 = TL_New(Date[P1Bar], Time[P1Bar], P1, Date, Time, GD);

If TL5 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL5, BearColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL5, Tool_Dotted);

End;

TL6 = TL_New(Date[P2Bar], Time[P2Bar], P2, Date, Time, GD);

If TL6 >= 0 Then Begin

TL_SetColor(TL6, BearColor);

TL_SetStyle(TL6, Tool_Dotted);

End;

End;

End;

End;

 

another one in jpy

 

zitko's indicator is pointing to a bearish buttelfly on gbp 30m

 

Do u C what I C?

 
camisa:
zitko's indicator is pointing to a bearish buttelfly on gbp 30m

The indicator isn't complete yet, it just gives XABCD points and print the retracement/expansions between these points, it doesn't check if these retracement/expansions fullfill the pattern rule or not.

 
kamyar:
another one in jpy

this pattern is inavlid,

according to the rules the AC line 0.832 or 0.886 , on this chart it is 1.09.

 
ziko123:
this pattern is inavlid, according to the rules the AC line 0.832 or 0.886 , on this chart it is 1.09.

hi ziko

thanks for your attention but i'm wondering what is your reason to say that the pattern is inavalid.i would be really delighted if u clarify it??????????

also take a look at the pic.maybe i made a mistake!!????????

 

The AC on my chart shows 1.09, let me check it again

 

AC = (high(b)-low(c))/(high(b)-low(a))

= (118.57-118.22)/(118.57-118.25) = 1.093 not 0.764

the AC line on you chart is connecting A to a point slightly higher than C

 
ziko123:
The reason I need a well defined rules is that I started developing an indicator for these patterns, I started with the bearish butterfly,

I'm attaching the indicator,

u can test with the earlier charts posted by kamyar last week,

test it with EURUSD,4H and EURCAD,4H

excellent indicator...excellent work...thanks

Reason: