Discussion of article "How to Order a Trading Robot in MQL5 and MQL4" - page 9

[---]

Rosh:
What prevents you from agreeing on everything first, and only then going through this step?

Probably the same greed of the proger:

Come on, come on, hurry up and lock money in your account, and then I'll see what the TOR is and whether I'll do it.

[Yurij Kozhevnikov]

Thanks, I see.

Although in my opinion, only after seeing the TOR, you can talk about the final cost.

"Greed of a proger" sounds insulting and is not supported by any facts.

I will refrain from generalising about the moderators of this resource.

[---]

Y.A.K._:

Thanks, I see.

Although in my opinion only after seeing the TOR can we talk about the final price.

So you agreed to a price when the TOR hasn't been approved?

then it's not greed, it's something else.

"Greed of a software engineer" sounds insulting and not backed up by any facts.

You want facts? Here they are.

[Armen]

Y.A.K._:

"Greed of a proger" sounds insulting and is not supported by any facts.

I will refrain from generalising about the moderators of this resource.

and how else can you explain that some (NOT ALL! ) developers confirm TOR and then only start to get into it?

[Yurij Kozhevnikov]

You have slightly misunderstood my question.

I was asking about the situation when the customer attaches the ToR and moves on to the next step, and the contractor sees the ToR, reads it and has not yet clicked the agree button on his part.

[Andrey F. Zelinsky]

Y.A.K._:

You have slightly misunderstood my question.

I was asking about the situation when the customer attaches the ToR and moves on to the next step, and the contractor sees the ToR, reads it and has not yet clicked the consent button on his part.

For Rosh: The question is reasonable and really not elaborated in the article under discussion.

for Y.A.K._: If the customer has already passed the Providing TOR stage (defined the price ready for blocking and attached the TOR), and the executor has not passed this stage yet, then there are variants of events:

a) the contractor agrees and confirms the stage -- further either completion or cancellation through Arbitration

b) if it is necessary to change the price, the customer selects the contractor in new or rejected - and goes through all over again with a new price.

c) if it is not necessary to change the price, but it is necessary to change the TOR -- the customer simply resubmits the TOR.

d) if the customer wants to cancel -- either selects to new or rejected -- or deletes the bid if it is under 30 days old.

e) if the contractor wants to cancel -- either delete his bid, or forget it, or only point d)

[Yurij Kozhevnikov]

abolk:

If the customer has already passed the stage of Submission of TOR (has determined the price ready for blocking and attached the TOR), and the contractor has not yet passed this stage, then there are options of events:

a) you agree and confirm the stage -- further either completion or cancellation through Arbitration

b) if it is necessary to change the price -- the customer selects you in the new or rejected -- and passes all over again with a new price

c) if it is not necessary to change the price, but it is necessary to change the TOR -- the customer simply reposts the TOR.

d) if the customer wants to cancel -- either selects you as new or rejected -- or deletes the order if it is under 30 days old.

e) if the contractor wants to cancel -- only point d).

Thank you very much.

This is the only substantive answer. The others are either a question for a question, or decided to troll the newcomer a little :)

[choirman]

Hi,

Is there a way to update the original job posting after it is in the in progress mode?

I wasn't able to find the option to do this.

Thank you.

[Valerii Starikov]

Hi!

For an hour I can't find "Sample TOR for a Programmer".

You're not holding it on purpose? Are you increasing the amount of chaos? Or am I that awkward?

I need a sample where:

1. everything is taken into account that may be needed (variables, magic numbers, number of positions...).

2. block of indicators to be used

3. basic trading rules

4. peculiarities of different situations (e.g. strict or non-strict equality)

5. capital management, slippage, communication failures (repeated command).

WHAT ELSE IS THERE? Maybe there is a different order or form?

THE GOAL IS TO CAPITALISE IT AND GRADUALLY TURN IT INTO YOUR OWN STRATEGY WHERE

1) everything is accounted for

2) convenient designations of variables, indicators, actions are used.

IS THERE SUCH A FORM???

https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/361

"3. What is the ideal TOR?" GOOD START!!! GIVE ME A SAMPLE!!!

[Rashid Umarov]

valestar:

Hi!

For an hour I can't find "Sample TOR for a Programmer".

You're not holding it on purpose? Are you increasing the amount of chaos? Or am I that awkward?

You need a sample where:

Check out the article https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/235