Enrique Enguix
- MT5 Robustness Auditor em AntiOverfit Audit
- Espanha
- 120954
|
5+ anos
experiência
|
2
produtos
|
8146
versão demo
|
|
0
trabalhos
|
0
sinais
|
0
assinantes
|
Professional audit service for MetaTrader 5 Expert Advisors.
I am the creator of AntiOverfit PRO and the operator of AntiOverfit Audit, an independent practice focused on detecting statistical fragility, excessive historical-path dependency and overfitting in Expert Advisors.
A beautiful backtest is not enough.
My work is to check whether an EA remains reasonably stable when it is no longer tested only on the exact historical path that may have favored it.
I provide personalized audits for developers, vendors and clients who want to validate the robustness of an Expert Advisor before putting money, reputation or commercial capital behind it.
The audit analyzes:
- Robustness across multiple synthetic market scenarios.
- Result stability.
- Sensitivity to the historical path.
- Profit Factor.
- Expected Payoff.
- Drawdown.
- Recovery.
- Consistency.
- Bias.
- Operational viability.
- Trade count.
- Abnormal signals or suspiciously stable patterns.
At the end of the process, I provide an audit report and, when applicable, a verifiable certificate that can be published on a sales page to increase transparency and client trust.
I do not certify future profitability.
I do not provide financial advice.
I do not promise profits.
I only certify whether the system shows reasonable signs of statistical robustness under the specific conditions of the performed test.
All my Expert Advisors and tools:
https://www.mql5.com/es/users/envex/seller
New MQL5 Group:
https://www.mql5.com/es/messages/01c72081307dda01
Telegram Channel:
https://t.me/+Jwdm825813I1Nzk0
I am the creator of AntiOverfit PRO and the operator of AntiOverfit Audit, an independent practice focused on detecting statistical fragility, excessive historical-path dependency and overfitting in Expert Advisors.
A beautiful backtest is not enough.
My work is to check whether an EA remains reasonably stable when it is no longer tested only on the exact historical path that may have favored it.
I provide personalized audits for developers, vendors and clients who want to validate the robustness of an Expert Advisor before putting money, reputation or commercial capital behind it.
The audit analyzes:
- Robustness across multiple synthetic market scenarios.
- Result stability.
- Sensitivity to the historical path.
- Profit Factor.
- Expected Payoff.
- Drawdown.
- Recovery.
- Consistency.
- Bias.
- Operational viability.
- Trade count.
- Abnormal signals or suspiciously stable patterns.
At the end of the process, I provide an audit report and, when applicable, a verifiable certificate that can be published on a sales page to increase transparency and client trust.
I do not certify future profitability.
I do not provide financial advice.
I do not promise profits.
I only certify whether the system shows reasonable signs of statistical robustness under the specific conditions of the performed test.
All my Expert Advisors and tools:
https://www.mql5.com/es/users/envex/seller
New MQL5 Group:
https://www.mql5.com/es/messages/01c72081307dda01
Telegram Channel:
https://t.me/+Jwdm825813I1Nzk0
Enrique Enguix
Following up on yesterday’s explanation, I ran an optimization of the “My Favourite” set — a process I’ll be applying to the other sets as well.
The original Take Profit was relatively low, and a significant portion of profit was being lost to swaps and commissions. It was set at 25% of the ATR. To refine it, I ran a 3D optimization (since 2D didn’t show the relationships clearly).
X-axis: Take Profit from 25% to 200% ATR.
Y-axis: backtest start delay from 0 to 2000 days, in 50-day increments (50 different start dates).
The most robust area emerged around 100% ATR. I’ll be testing this configuration to confirm its consistency.
Development is ongoing — every day brings small improvements. It will never be perfect, but the goal is to make it consistently good enough.
If this change turns out to be a real step forward, it will be uploaded
The original Take Profit was relatively low, and a significant portion of profit was being lost to swaps and commissions. It was set at 25% of the ATR. To refine it, I ran a 3D optimization (since 2D didn’t show the relationships clearly).
X-axis: Take Profit from 25% to 200% ATR.
Y-axis: backtest start delay from 0 to 2000 days, in 50-day increments (50 different start dates).
The most robust area emerged around 100% ATR. I’ll be testing this configuration to confirm its consistency.
Development is ongoing — every day brings small improvements. It will never be perfect, but the goal is to make it consistently good enough.
If this change turns out to be a real step forward, it will be uploaded
· 2
Enrique Enguix
“I won’t lie to you — I was expecting solid results.
But what’s happening with the Gold Set… it’s honestly blowing me away.”
When I built this setup for NEXUS, I spent hours fine-tuning every detail.
Backtests over several years.
Thousands of trades.
And the stats were clear:
91.37% win rate on shorts
93.13% on longs
Fast trades, low exposure, sniper-like entries.
So yeah, I knew it was strong.
But seeing real users report 100% winning trades week after week…
That still hit different.
What’s wild is: it’s not just one user.
It's happening across different accounts, brokers, setups — and the consistency is insane.
This isn’t magic.
It’s not a “holy grail.”
But it’s a system built to enter where it matters and exit before things go sideways.
Will it lose someday?
Of course.
This is trading — not a fairy tale.
But seeing the community validate it like this…
It reminds me why I built NEXUS in the first place:
To deliver a real tool for real traders.
Without hype. Without shortcuts. Without BS.
Just precision.
And results.
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/90877
But what’s happening with the Gold Set… it’s honestly blowing me away.”
When I built this setup for NEXUS, I spent hours fine-tuning every detail.
Backtests over several years.
Thousands of trades.
And the stats were clear:
91.37% win rate on shorts
93.13% on longs
Fast trades, low exposure, sniper-like entries.
So yeah, I knew it was strong.
But seeing real users report 100% winning trades week after week…
That still hit different.
What’s wild is: it’s not just one user.
It's happening across different accounts, brokers, setups — and the consistency is insane.
This isn’t magic.
It’s not a “holy grail.”
But it’s a system built to enter where it matters and exit before things go sideways.
Will it lose someday?
Of course.
This is trading — not a fairy tale.
But seeing the community validate it like this…
It reminds me why I built NEXUS in the first place:
To deliver a real tool for real traders.
Without hype. Without shortcuts. Without BS.
Just precision.
And results.
https://www.mql5.com/en/market/product/90877
· 2